Re: xpress h51 prop
Not familiar with the hull on that boat. From the data it seems to be an efficient design.
Your numbers look good to me for the prop pitch you are running with that engine.....know nothing else but what I have read in your thread. What I am saying here is that if I had your prop on my boat it would run where you are running.
As Kenny said, the gearbox is 2.33 and has been on the 90 for a long time......at least back thru '94. I think the 90 was geared to be a midrange workhorse which is surely is. On a light fast boat you need to prop it up.
I know setup and hull design and all that has a tremendous effect on performance as D and Ken point out.
In my case I am running a stock alum pad bass boat with a 20 degree dead rise to the transom (pic on my Avatar at 50 mph). That puts my lower unit 13" behind the bottom at the transom. The way the transom is made, the engine has to sit in the first hole up. So, my numbers do have some performance goodies built in. Don't know what you have in that arena that you might tweak before hitting the prop (got it from the pro's d

. One problem I do have is that my transom tilt is so high that I run out of trim before I can get the prop to ventilate. I think if I had 5 ish degrees more trim I could get more perf out of this rig/setup.
The other thing that I found is that prop efficiency has a whopping big effect on rpm's for a given speed.....like on mine, 3 mph and 600 rpm's lost with a (an inefficient) 23P as compared to the HiPerf 24P I normally run. ........(you'd think a lower pitch would spin up faster.....not so).
I use BAM prop calculator and slip is very low....around 10%.
In summary, your gearbox is 15% lower than "normal" so for the same perf, you prop has to be 15% higher as a rule of thumb.
Per Kenny's comment, Rudy is probably running a 2:1 on his Rude and you can't go by his numbers.
HTH
Mark