Re: Horsepower/thrust
I agree with optsyeagle and reelfishin. Skipping the theory of series-wound versus shunt-wound DC motors (in theory, series-wound units can produce unlimited power -- limited only by the power source), the manufacturers blur the engineering truth by rating electric trolling motors in a different manner (thrust) than gas outboards (HP).
Seems like a deliberate dodge, intended to dazzle and confuse the customer. After all, when buying a land-use electric motor, it is rated in HP, not thrust. Aside from just a few trolling motors (the minn-kota 3 hp and the torqeedo electric ob for example), we are left with an apples-to-oranges comparison when shopping for small motors. The only way to get a solid HP number from a thrust-rated electric is to do as optsy did, and actually do an on-the-water test, followed by some math. Of course even this testing method ignores the differences in power/rpm curves, as well as prop differences.
Reminds me of the (gross hp) versus (brake hp) rating differences in ob motors. At one time, the Jap outboards were pounding the heck out of the US units -- only because their rating system gave HP at the prop, where the US guys were rating at the crank. The difference can easily be 10-15%, due to losses in the transmission of power to the prop. Of course, today, all ob's are supposed to be rated at the prop.
Then there are the differences in noise (gas motors are usually noisier) and weight (the batteries for the electric usually add up to more weight)...
Returning to the original question then, probably any small ob (commonly available at 2.5 hp and up) would achieve or exceed the forward performance of a 67# electric. Depending on propeller geometry, these motors will probably not be too efficient in reverse, but then many of these motors don't have a reverse gear -- you spin the entire unit around backwards.