Nandy
Commander
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2004
- Messages
- 2,145
Well, troubles selling attack again! I have a family member visit about a month ago due to a family emergency. He dont live in this state. He was in need of money and wanted to sell one of his guitars. Since he was visiting I offer to help by providing my email as a mean of contact. After the first email contact I used my phone to communicate with the prospect buyers but I passed the phone to the seller in order for him to answer questions.
Both guitars were posted in Craigslist to see which sell first. One of them was a Martin D. He asked a bit under 600 for it. I thought it was crazy to try to sell a guitar for that much money but I help him list it. I used my email as he don't have one.
In less than 10 minutes the emails started to fly, Im not lying to you, over 21 emails about 30 minutes after I post it. I realized we probably was selling it too low but at that time we were not changing the price.
The first buyer showed up and after see it, play it and inspect it he try to get it 100 dollars cheaper. Of course after all that amount of interest the seller said no and the guy purchased it. I was so curious about the right price for the guitar so I researched it. The price of the guitar is over $2,000...
About a week after that he buyer calls and claims the guitar is a counterfeit and he wants his money. He goes around how he talked to all of his police friends and how they told him to file charges. I told him he was barking at the wrong tree as I did not sell him the guitar or profit from the sale in any way and his police/lawyer/court gibberish did not impressed me at all. He asked for the seller phone number but I did not give it away and told the buyer I will tell the seller what he claimed. Of course, the seller dont believe him. I believe the seller had no idea, if in fact this is a counterfeit, that this was not a real Martin D. He would not offer it to me if he knew it was a fake.
I explained the buyer the seller was a bit skeptic. The buyer supposedly contacted Martin later on and described the guitar and gave the serial number. Martin supposedly replied back agreeing that was not a martin guitar. Seller contacts me and send me the email. I call the buyer and tells him what the seller told me (I cant sent him the email, he dont have one) and ask him to call him. He is skeptic but he says he will talk to the buyer. Buyer calls again and claims the seller has not called. I called seller again and he says he will call buyer. 2 weeks pass and I get another email from the seller asking if the buyer was calling him or not so he could start legal action. I told him I have done all I could and could not tell him what the buyer was going to do as I have no idea. He replies back telling me that he is going to take legal action against me as he claims I am part of the sale party unless i give him all the money or 2 third of the money and he get to keep the guitar.
I told him I did not care about his legal action and not to call me or email me back and I was done with him. Of course, he emailed back venting his frustration which I will not reply.
So, If you ask me, he dont have a leg to stand taking me to court to claim money. I did not own the guitar, sell the guitar to him or profit in any way. What do you think about that?
As far as the seller, legally, I dont think he has to return all the money. He is not a luthier or a guitar expert and represented the guitar to the best of his knowledge. The buyer should have bring his luthier or someone knowledgeable before buying the guitar. As the seller should have do his research before pricing the guitar the buyer should have done his research before buying the guitar but he was in too much in a hurry and too greedy to get the guitar first to take the time to do his research. It does bother me that he tried to low ball the seller for as much as 100 dollar from a guitar that was already priced a quarter of the price.
However, if I were the seller i would probably give him half the money back... But that is not my decision...
Both guitars were posted in Craigslist to see which sell first. One of them was a Martin D. He asked a bit under 600 for it. I thought it was crazy to try to sell a guitar for that much money but I help him list it. I used my email as he don't have one.
In less than 10 minutes the emails started to fly, Im not lying to you, over 21 emails about 30 minutes after I post it. I realized we probably was selling it too low but at that time we were not changing the price.
The first buyer showed up and after see it, play it and inspect it he try to get it 100 dollars cheaper. Of course after all that amount of interest the seller said no and the guy purchased it. I was so curious about the right price for the guitar so I researched it. The price of the guitar is over $2,000...
About a week after that he buyer calls and claims the guitar is a counterfeit and he wants his money. He goes around how he talked to all of his police friends and how they told him to file charges. I told him he was barking at the wrong tree as I did not sell him the guitar or profit from the sale in any way and his police/lawyer/court gibberish did not impressed me at all. He asked for the seller phone number but I did not give it away and told the buyer I will tell the seller what he claimed. Of course, the seller dont believe him. I believe the seller had no idea, if in fact this is a counterfeit, that this was not a real Martin D. He would not offer it to me if he knew it was a fake.
I explained the buyer the seller was a bit skeptic. The buyer supposedly contacted Martin later on and described the guitar and gave the serial number. Martin supposedly replied back agreeing that was not a martin guitar. Seller contacts me and send me the email. I call the buyer and tells him what the seller told me (I cant sent him the email, he dont have one) and ask him to call him. He is skeptic but he says he will talk to the buyer. Buyer calls again and claims the seller has not called. I called seller again and he says he will call buyer. 2 weeks pass and I get another email from the seller asking if the buyer was calling him or not so he could start legal action. I told him I have done all I could and could not tell him what the buyer was going to do as I have no idea. He replies back telling me that he is going to take legal action against me as he claims I am part of the sale party unless i give him all the money or 2 third of the money and he get to keep the guitar.
I told him I did not care about his legal action and not to call me or email me back and I was done with him. Of course, he emailed back venting his frustration which I will not reply.
So, If you ask me, he dont have a leg to stand taking me to court to claim money. I did not own the guitar, sell the guitar to him or profit in any way. What do you think about that?
As far as the seller, legally, I dont think he has to return all the money. He is not a luthier or a guitar expert and represented the guitar to the best of his knowledge. The buyer should have bring his luthier or someone knowledgeable before buying the guitar. As the seller should have do his research before pricing the guitar the buyer should have done his research before buying the guitar but he was in too much in a hurry and too greedy to get the guitar first to take the time to do his research. It does bother me that he tried to low ball the seller for as much as 100 dollar from a guitar that was already priced a quarter of the price.
However, if I were the seller i would probably give him half the money back... But that is not my decision...