Re: 69' merc 500---no top end
Hmmmm, how about that. Did I miss something, or is this accurate. <br /><br />From the fuel consumption sheet I noticed that at 232 hp, the test unit was consuming .5lb of fuel/hp/hr.<br /><br />Unless I missed something that's 232(hp) x .5(lb/hp/hr)/7 (roughly....lbs/gallon) = about 16 gallons per hour.<br /><br />My 120hp Chevy II 4 banger (auto engine adapted to a marine environment) would run out at 4 gph, so if it were to double the size to 240 hp (comparable to your dyno report) it would run around 8 gph.<br /><br />Looks like you are gaining in weight, getting 230 hp for 350# of weight, but paying the bill at the pump.<br /><br />As I recall that was the reason Mazda dropped the Wankel design years ago......couldn't get the mileage out of it to satisfy the consumer.<br /><br />But you're right sorta; auto engine adapapted to a marine environment.....but when Mr. Wankel developed it, I don't know where he planned on using it....so I don't know....but so what.<br /><br />Hope you are enjoying it......one thing though, they were surely smooth running hummers.<br /><br />Mark