73 Evinrude 65hp

pkrainert

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Messages
196
I have a chance to trade my 2002 8hp johnson for this 73 evinrude. I havent had a chance to go see it in person yet. From these pictures can you tell me anything that looks like it will need to be replaced. I Know the switch on the tilt has to be changed. Other then that he said it runs great. But they all say that.

Picture023.jpg



Picture019.jpg
 

pkrainert

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Messages
196
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

He is willing to let me do a compression test so that is all good. I was told to check for spark and timing but i don't have a timing light. Also I just realized that my boat is rated for 60hp. Is this going to be too heavy?
 

jay_merrill

Vice Admiral
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
5,653
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

There isn't going to be a weight difference of significance between this motor and about any 60hp. From a safety standpoint, I wouldn't worry about the +5hp difference. From an insurance and liability standpoint, it could become an issue.

One thing that strikes me about your motor is that the photos suggest that the powerhead was painted at some point. The powerpack looks like a replacement unit (Sierra or CDI) but the color is wrong. Aftermarket powerpacks are most often either black of white (original has a metal exterior), but yours appears to be the same color as the powerhead. If it has been painted, i would ask why. If it has been recently painted, the most logical explanation would be that the paint is an attempt to coverup signs of overheat. I could be wrong about this, and hope that I am, but I would ask the question.


PS: I think I just answered my own question - that motor looks like it has a 1972 powerhead in it. I see a throttle cable only, which would indicate that the motor was converted to a hydro-electric shift. Look at the control box because it may have push buttons for the shifting function. If it happens to be a Johnson control box, it may say "Hydroelectric" on it. In either case, if there is no shift cable, that's what it is.

The midsection does appear to be a 1973 or later, because the transom bracket has a torque tube for the steering cable. The 1972 motors don't have this.

This ERude looks like it might be a "mix-n-match" motor. While motors that have been built up from parts can be just fine, it looks like a little homework on this motor might be in order.


PS #2: The motor has had a "pee tube" added to it, which is usefull. I'm not overly impressed with the work though - the person who did the work just drilled a large hole in the lower cowl and ran the hose through it. I think I would have done the job right by purchasing the very inexpensive fitting that goes in the lower pan. Hopefully this workmanship is not indicative of other work done to the motor.
 

pkrainert

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Messages
196
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

I have not yet traded the motor so I haven't seen it in person only those pictures. Thanks for the input.
 

reelfishin

Captain
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
3,050
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

With that odd wood adapter it looks to be a short shaft motor on a taller transom. They did make a few of those in 15" shaft so make sure it's what you need before you trade. I can't make out the wiring well enough to see if it has the telltale green and blue leads for the shift solenoid.
I have two 1972 Evinrude 65 HP motors that are electric shift and look identical to that one. Same decals and same under hood layout. The difference is that mine are painted bronze with no blue other than on the cover logo.
The Hydroelectric shifted 65 HP was a one year motor since the 65HP started in 1972 as Hydroelectric shift then in 1973 they switched to hydro-mechanical shifting.
I'd venture to guess that the model number on that motor are 65272S making it a 15' shaft motor. (If it's a 20" shaft motor on sitting on a 25" transom, then the model number would be 65273S) (Third digit denotes year).
 

jay_merrill

Vice Admiral
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
5,653
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

I have just spent some time looking through parts diagrams for the 1972 and 1973 65hp ERudes, and have been comparing the photos of your potential "buy" with two 1972 Johnson 65hp motors that I own. At this point, I think what you have is a 1972 20" shaft length ERude.

I see what Reelfishin means in regard to the wood adapter, but the midsection (exhaust housing) dimension looks like the 20" part to me. One tipoff in this regard is that a size comparison between the lower mounting bracket height v. the height of the portion of the midsection that lies below where the lower mounting bracket fits, suggests a 20" midsection. Also, if you look at the height of the gearbox v. the midsection height, the ratio is about right for a 20" motor. Another factor in my assumption is that I do believe that you have a 1972 motor and the 15" shaft length wasn't available in the 1972, while it was in 1973.

I still think Reelfishin's point is well taken though and you should keep it in mind - If I am wrong and he is right, you are looking at a motor that isn't going to work with most boats made to take an engine of this size/hp rating.

The one question mark, however, is that the swivel bracket and transom bracket on this motor is definately not from a 1972 motor. I think what is going on, is that those parts were swapped for what you have now, in order to have the torque tube that the 1972 motor didn't have. Swapping these parts may have also been done because the owner wanted T&T, and found an assemby that had one.

I also took another look at the powerpack in your photo. I was probably wrong about it being painted. What confused me is that the shape is not like the original powerpack in the J65hp that I now have on my boat. I replaced it, but still have the old one and just double-checked. But - on my other motor (in the shop), there is a powerpack that looks just like "yours." It has a metallic cover over and a white body. I'm not sure if either of these powerpacks (yours or the one on my 2nd motor) are originals, but both are probably very old. That suggests the possibility of replacement in the not too distant future.

I also believe that the timer base in the motor you are considering is an original or older part. If you look at the photo of the powerhead, you will see a metallic arm underneath the flywheel. That arm is part of the timer base and is connected to the top of the motor's spark advance lever. The original timer bases look essentially like a tin cup, with the arm that I just described. They are all metallic, with visible sensor coils that could be replaced and adjusted. Currently available replacement parts are sealed units that are all plastic on the outside. The ones that I have seen are blue in color. Once again, I think you have an older part that might be a candidate for replacement.

On the issue of hydro-electric shift, in addition to having a throttle cable only, you can look for the shift wires in the engine cowl. Although they will possibly be inside of a black casing, the wire colors are blue and green. They will run from the plug, around the back side of the engine, to a point just in front of the powerhead's exhaust cover, on the port side. There will be a pair of blade connectors at that point, and the wiring will pass down into the midsection. If you see this, I would say that there isn't any doubt that you have a hydro-electric shift unit, which is further indication of a 1972 motor. Also, the standard plug connector color for the 1972 model is yellow.

If the motor does turn out to be hydro-electric shift, the biggest issue concerning the "buy-no buy" decision is condition of the shift switch in the control unit. These parts are no longer available from BRP, so if the one for this motor doesn't work, the motor isn't worth much. Even if you find a NOS part somewhere, expect to pay about $300 - $400 for it. The same is true for the wiring that runs from the blade connectors in the cowl, to the solenoids in the gearbox. Ditto for the solenoids themselves. Just to give you a "for instance," I bought my second J65hp for $150 just because the shift switch in the guy's control unit was bad.

Reelfishin also gave you info on engine model numbers. That is good info but I just discovered something that I would not have noticed if he hadn't brought the issue up - there is a model number "65273S" (there were 20" & 25" models only, so the "S" is the 20" motor), which is a 1972 motor. The 73S would easily cause confusion as to year, and that may be why the seller thinks he has a 1973 motor. When I compare your photos with the parts diagrams for the 1972 motor, however, everything except the swivel & transom brackets look like the 1972 motor, including the badging on the hood.

In retrospect, my opinion is that if your 8hp motor is in good condition, it is worth more than this 65hp Erude. I would modify that opinion if I thought that the ERude was in exceptional condition, and had been recently refurbished (rebuilt carbs, water pump, fuel pump, ignition system, etc.), but this does not appear to be the case. I recommend that you approach this deal with caution because you could be getting an ERude that is worth a few hundred dollars at best, and needs hundreds of dollars worth of upgrades.
 

reelfishin

Captain
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
3,050
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

I have just spent some time looking through parts diagrams for the 1972 and 1973 65hp ERudes, and have been comparing the photos of your potential "buy" with two 1972 Johnson 65hp motors that I own. At this point, I think what you have is a 1972 20" shaft length ERude.

I see what Reelfishin means in regard to the wood adapter, but the midsection (exhaust housing) dimension looks like the 20" part to me. One tipoff in this regard is that a size comparison between the lower mounting bracket height v. the height of the portion of the midsection that lies below where the lower mounting bracket fits, suggests a 20" midsection. Also, if you look at the height of the gearbox v. the midsection height, the ratio is about right for a 20" motor. Another factor in my assumption is that I do believe that you have a 1972 motor and the 15" shaft length wasn't available in the 1972, while it was in 1973.

I still think Reelfishin's point is well taken though and you should keep it in mind - If I am wrong and he is right, you are looking at a motor that isn't going to work with most boats made to take an engine of this size/hp rating.

The one question mark, however, is that the swivel bracket and transom bracket on this motor is definately not from a 1972 motor. I think what is going on, is that those parts were swapped for what you have now, in order to have the torque tube that the 1972 motor didn't have. Swapping these parts may have also been done because the owner wanted T&T, and found an assemby that had one..............

On the issue of hydro-electric shift, in addition to having a throttle cable only, you can look for the shift wires in the engine cowl. Although they will possibly be inside of a black casing, the wire colors are blue and green. They will run from the plug, around the back side of the engine, to a point just in front of the powerhead's exhaust cover, on the port side. There will be a pair of blade connectors at that point, and the wiring will pass down into the midsection. If you see this, I would say that there isn't any doubt that you have a hydro-electric shift unit, which is further indication of a 1972 motor. Also, the standard plug connector color for the 1972 model is yellow.....................

Reelfishin also gave you info on engine model numbers. That is good info but I just discovered something that I would not have noticed if he hadn't brought the issue up - there is a model number "65273S" (there were 20" & 25" models only, so the "S" is the 20" motor), which is a 1972 motor. The 73S would easily cause confusion as to year, and that may be why the seller thinks he has a 1973 motor. When I compare your photos with the parts diagrams for the 1972 motor, however, everything except the swivel & transom brackets look like the 1972 motor, including the badging on the hood.
.........


Good call on the bracket issue, I saw the odd bracket but it didn't sink in till now. That alone really makes me wonder what they did. If it is a newer bracket, then chances are that the model tag will be from the motor which the bracket came from. Of course there's the other point that it may be a 1973, which used the newer bracket style with a 1972 cover on it?

I have 4 65 HP Erude and Johnson motors here, three 1972, and one 1973. The 1973 has the newer bracket but only power tilt, not full tilt and trim. It uses a single ram.
One 1972 is a 72S, and is a 15" shaft, it came off an old wood boat.
The two other 1972 motors are 20" models, one Johnson 65ESL72S and a 65273S Erude, both are low hour original motors.

I wasn't aware they made a 25" shaft length anything in 1972-73?

If it were a 25" shaft motor, then it would most likely work fine on a 20" transom as the newer bracket style usually has sufficient extra holes to be able to mount the added height motor on the smaller transom. I've done this with several newer motors with good results.


If you look at the parts lists for the 72S and the 73S models, you'll see that part location 46 has two part numbers and the parts list is the same for both models. If I compare my 65HP 20" motor to the pic here, my exhaust housing is notably longer by about 5". A bracket to bottom plate measurement is about 21".

The short shaft 72S model I have looks like his but mine has the old style multiple section bracket.

All of the above info is making me think that this motor is either a 1973 20" shaft with some 1972 parts, or a hobbled together 1972 short shaft.
The contradicting points are the short looking mid section and the newer bracket, the two should never fit together if it's a 1972 or 1973 motor.

I also see that the 20" 1973 motor used the newer bracket while the 15' 1973 retained the old style bracket.

The lower unit is different, the cover and bracket don't go together for sure, and the colors are wrong. Other than that it's pretty hard to tell what it is without seeing it in person.
 

jay_merrill

Vice Admiral
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
5,653
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

Reelfishin, I agree that this one is sort of a head-scratcher. You are also right on the 1972 25" shaft length - after review, I missed on that one & now don't think there was a 25" model, just the 20" model.

One thing that does seem certain to me is that this motor has a 1972 powerhead, cover and gearcase on it.

One suggestion that I would make to the OP is to remove the front and rear exhaust housing covers (the two piece ring cowling around the top of the exhaust housing) on the motor. Doing so will reveal the point at which the shift wires pass down into the exhaust housing. If this piece is from a 1972 motor, the entry point should be on the port side of the motor, under the leading edge of the powerhead's exhaust manifold section. There should be a molded plug around the wire and the assembly should look manufactured.

If the point at which the shift wires pass into the exhaust housing looks home made, and/or is in a non-standard location, chances are that the entire assembly, including the swivel and transon brackets are from a 1973 motor. As Reelfishin pointed out, this would also explain why the seller describes the motor as a 1973. It is because the data plate would have a 1973 model number on it.

I think that any way this motor is viewed, however, it is a hybrid of some sort.
 

TN-25

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
620
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

That motor sure looks like a 1972 model. The 1973 version was unique in that it was all blue. Curiously, Evinrude reverted back to silver-gold for 1974 and stayed with it a bunch of years.

1973 marked a change in the shift mechanism and the corresponding remote controls.

Attached is a '73 Evinrude Triumph 65.
 

Attachments

  • 73EvinrudeTriumph65.jpg
    73EvinrudeTriumph65.jpg
    23.7 KB · Views: 0

reelfishin

Captain
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
3,050
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

That motor sure looks like a 1972 model. The 1973 version was unique in that it was all blue. Curiously, Evinrude reverted back to silver-gold for 1974 and stayed with it a bunch of years.

1973 marked a change in the shift mechanism and the corresponding remote controls.

Attached is a '73 Evinrude Triumph 65.

The color is a clue, but the mid section could also be Johnson, which I believe were a gold color even in 1973. Either way it's a cross breed of some sort.
 

jay_merrill

Vice Admiral
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
5,653
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

Both of my 1972 Johnson 65hp motors are a light green color, with a white hood. I'm not sure what color the '72 ERude was.

Reelfishin, I think your thoughts about paint color may have offered an additional clue - look at the faded red stripe at the bottom of the midsection on this motor. If that was a stock paint item, and was particular to a given year, it might tell us what year the midsection is. It also looks like the gearcase was painted.


PS: Just surfed the net a bit - the '73 ERude was a light blue color, as in TN's pic but most found now are faded somewhat. As an afterthought, it also occurs to me that this midsection could be from something other than a 65hp engine, because it was used on a number of different models.
 

reelfishin

Captain
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
3,050
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

That stripe could even be a manufacturers motor package or similar. (Like the Tracker motors were later on).
That mid section and bracket can only be from a few years, that lower mount changed in the later 70's. I'd say a 5 or 6 year span at best.

I have a 1976 135hp with that stripe and gold paint. The mid on that however is larger than the 3 cylinders.
The paint chips on that motor look more like Johnson green than Erude gold.
I also see a bit of light blue color to the head and cover on the motor, but it could be the lighting.
My take is that someone had several motors and made one from what they had. A real Johnnyrude abortion.
I can't laugh, I have a late 60's 33HP that's just as mixed up, but it runs like new. It's a combination of about 5 motors with some 40 hp parts tossed in. I never did paint it, it's blue, green, gold, white, with a super low pitch 4 blade prop. The first cross breeding was done to make it a 20" shaft motor, those parts came from a newer 40HP, then I added electric start, and the ability to charge the battery. The motor is red, blue, white, and gold with various bolt parts from various motors. One of these days I'll make it all match, it will be an Evinrude since that's what the cover is from and it's in good shape.
 

jay_merrill

Vice Admiral
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
5,653
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

Yup, those "Heintz 57" motors can be good one! One of my '58 ERude Bigtwins has a Johnson powerhead on it. One or the other of them (I forget which at this point) has a Johnson starter and gearcase on it. I also have a 1965 Johnson 6hp with a gearcase off of a late fifties Johnson 5.5hp. But, as long as they work, I'm happy!
 

reelfishin

Captain
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
3,050
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

Yup, those "Heintz 57" motors can be good one! One of my '58 ERude Bigtwins has a Johnson powerhead on it. One or the other of them (I forget which at this point) has a Johnson starter and gearcase on it. I also have a 1965 Johnson 6hp with a gearcase off of a late fifties Johnson 5.5hp. But, as long as they work, I'm happy!

The above is why I tend to stick with Johnson/Evinrudes. I have a few Mercs but not really by choice. If they run when I get them they stay but sooner or later it seems they all end up with an Evinrude or Johnson.

I picked up another 1972 65hp today, a Johnson 20" shaft version. The model though is a 65ESL, without the usually '72S' on the end? Its another mint clean motor from the same place, I found this one packed away in a storage building. (Too bad the years they decided to pack away were all electric shift). It looks clean enough that it may never have been run or installed. I now have a matched pair of Johnsons in perfect shape, both 1972 long shaft motors. Maybe I'll do a twin 65hp electric shift pair on something?
 

jay_merrill

Vice Admiral
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
5,653
Re: 73 Evinrude 65hp

Just stumbled back into this thread while looking for something else.

With Ezeke's help, I think I finally figured this one out - the motor he was looking at isn't a 1973. Its probably a 1972 Evinrude, model 65273. The owner probably thinks its a 1973 because of the "73" in the model number. I made the same mistake recently, until Ezeke pointed out that the 3rd digit (the "2"), indicates the model year.

I do believe he is correct, because I now have a steering bracket and part of the transom bracket assembly off of an ERude 65273 on my 1972 Johnson 65ESL72, now making it a "JonnyRude!"
 
Top