- Joined
- Jul 18, 2011
- Messages
- 18,285
I did my annual compression test on my boat. This is the first test that I have done, . . . the marine surveyor did the initial compression test last year. Here are the results below . . Blue line is 2012 pre-purchase survey . . Pink is my recent test. I suspect that there are some differences in the surveyors gauge versus my gauge, but the patterns are consistent year-to-year.

As was the case last year, the PORT engine is a bit 'stronger' than the STARBOARD engine, based on the higher compression numbers for the port engine. I also noticed a slight difference in the appearance of the spark plugs (New AC Delco MR43T) . . . the PORT engine plugs looked perfect. . . the STARBOARD engine plugs had a bit more carbon, but not bad, just different.
The PORT engine looks like it had a valve job somewhere along its life (heads are un-painted), whereas the STARBOARD engine appears to be original. So, that would explain the difference in about 4 psi between the engines.
Compression Gauge Effects
I also did some calculations of the effect that the length of hose for the compression test gauge has on the readings. Since the check valve is up at the gauge (and not at the base of the hose) the hose acts as part of the combustion chamber volume, pressurizing and de-pressurizing with each cycle of the engine. I did some measuring and it looks like the hose is 3/16" ID and 21" long. In total that adds 9 CC (cubic centimeters) to the combustion chamber, which is approx. 118 CC to begin with. . . so the hose makes it act like a 127 CC chamber. The net effect of this particular hose would be to reduce 150 psi in a 118 CC camber to 139 psi in a 127 CC chamber. So 11 psi reduction due to the hose. I am thinking that I could either get a gauge with the check valve near the 'plug' fitting or one that has a smaller dia hose and a shorter hose.
Maybe I can re-configure my existing gauge & hose to move the check valve close to the plug fitting, that way, it will not act as part of the combustion chamber.

As was the case last year, the PORT engine is a bit 'stronger' than the STARBOARD engine, based on the higher compression numbers for the port engine. I also noticed a slight difference in the appearance of the spark plugs (New AC Delco MR43T) . . . the PORT engine plugs looked perfect. . . the STARBOARD engine plugs had a bit more carbon, but not bad, just different.
The PORT engine looks like it had a valve job somewhere along its life (heads are un-painted), whereas the STARBOARD engine appears to be original. So, that would explain the difference in about 4 psi between the engines.
Compression Gauge Effects
I also did some calculations of the effect that the length of hose for the compression test gauge has on the readings. Since the check valve is up at the gauge (and not at the base of the hose) the hose acts as part of the combustion chamber volume, pressurizing and de-pressurizing with each cycle of the engine. I did some measuring and it looks like the hose is 3/16" ID and 21" long. In total that adds 9 CC (cubic centimeters) to the combustion chamber, which is approx. 118 CC to begin with. . . so the hose makes it act like a 127 CC chamber. The net effect of this particular hose would be to reduce 150 psi in a 118 CC camber to 139 psi in a 127 CC chamber. So 11 psi reduction due to the hose. I am thinking that I could either get a gauge with the check valve near the 'plug' fitting or one that has a smaller dia hose and a shorter hose.
Maybe I can re-configure my existing gauge & hose to move the check valve close to the plug fitting, that way, it will not act as part of the combustion chamber.
Last edited: