Vic.S
Rear Admiral
- Joined
- May 4, 2004
- Messages
- 4,719
This question is partly prompted by the 100:1 vs 50:1 argument.
I have always belived that if an engine is being run hard / at high revs then a more oily mix is preferable but if the engine is only run under light loads and at low revs then a leaner mix, if suitable for that particular engine can be used.
In part my belief is based on my undersatnding that with VRO engines the oiling rate increses from 100:1 or even 150:1 when idling to 50:1 at high revs. Maybe I have misunderstood the theory behind VRO.
I am not realy interested in large powerful engines but in the smaller engine sizes so VRO is not something that applies.
I have recently been told that I have my theory the wrong way round and that the more oily mix should be used used if an engine is to be used under light loads and low revs or with log periods at idle speeds while the leaner 100:1 can be used if running at high speeds. The argument for this is that at low revs / small throttle openings very little fuel and therefore oil is being admitted to the engine so it is preferable to use a more oily mix while at high revs more fuel therefore more oil is admitted so the mix can be leaner.
Was I right in the first place or is what I am now told correct.
(Personally I would use a 50:1 mix in any engine for which the makers recommend 100:1 provided it did not lead to plug fouling problems.)
Expert opinions asked for. Thanks.
I have always belived that if an engine is being run hard / at high revs then a more oily mix is preferable but if the engine is only run under light loads and at low revs then a leaner mix, if suitable for that particular engine can be used.
In part my belief is based on my undersatnding that with VRO engines the oiling rate increses from 100:1 or even 150:1 when idling to 50:1 at high revs. Maybe I have misunderstood the theory behind VRO.
I am not realy interested in large powerful engines but in the smaller engine sizes so VRO is not something that applies.
I have recently been told that I have my theory the wrong way round and that the more oily mix should be used used if an engine is to be used under light loads and low revs or with log periods at idle speeds while the leaner 100:1 can be used if running at high speeds. The argument for this is that at low revs / small throttle openings very little fuel and therefore oil is being admitted to the engine so it is preferable to use a more oily mix while at high revs more fuel therefore more oil is admitted so the mix can be leaner.
Was I right in the first place or is what I am now told correct.
(Personally I would use a 50:1 mix in any engine for which the makers recommend 100:1 provided it did not lead to plug fouling problems.)
Expert opinions asked for. Thanks.