Populations have nothing to do with clarity. These are satelite photos and the quality has to do with the source.Originally posted by ZmOz:<br /> The blurry pics are in areas that aren't very populated. Apparently it's not worth whatever it costs to take the pic for so few people. Paying for it won't change that.
And why would they use a multi million dollar satellite to take pictures of unpopulated areas?Originally posted by Chief 100:<br />Populations have nothing to do with clarity. These are satelite photos and the quality has to do with the source.![]()
No. The photo of my house is about 3 to 4 years old.Originally posted by POINTER94:<br /> Are the photos updated with each satelite pass? Mine is so blurry as to be useless. Fun to look at just the same.
And why would they use a multi million dollar satellite to take pictures of populated areas?Originally posted by ZmOz:<br />And why would they use a multi million dollar satellite to take pictures of unpopulated areas?Originally posted by Chief 100:<br />Populations have nothing to do with clarity. These are satelite photos and the quality has to do with the source.![]()
Because there are lots of people there willing to throw money at Google to show them that picture.Originally posted by Chief 100:<br />And why would they use a multi million dollar satellite to take pictures of populated areas?![]()
I don't have google earth installed on this computer, but I think its File > Save Image, or something close to that. Then you need to upload it to a picture host such as photobucket.com.Originally posted by muskyone:<br /> how do you get it here
Originally posted by CN Spots:<br /><br /> just looking out for my peeps!<br /><br />Word-up homies<br /><br /><br />LOL...I think we got an IBoat ganster among us. Peace and a handle full of grease to you.