lncoop
Vice Admiral
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 5,147
So, the admiral has a little ES 300. It's a great car and she loves it, but it's a 2000 model with 118k on the O, so it's time to spend a few bucks. It's at the dealer right now (yes, the dealer
) getting a tranny flush and fill and new gasket and filter, new valve cover gaskets, new cam shaft seal and timing belt, passenger PDL switch, and a few other oddsies and endies. Total nut is $1200, which I gotta say seems very reasonable to me, especially for one of them fancy 'yotas. So, where's the rub, you ask. The original plan was to replace the strut mounts to eliminate an annoying noise the car makes when going over bumps. My service guy told me replacing the strut mounts should take care of it. However, he called me this morning and said the shop foreman overruled him and said the only way to eliminate the noise was to replace the struts. The difference between the two jobs is roughly a grand (600 vs 1600, rear struts only), but they agreed the best course was struts or nothing. They say the struts themselves are fine, so we're just talking a nuisance issue that doesn't impact safety or ride quality. Before I took the car to the dealer my tire shop had told me they could replace front and rear struts with top of the line Monroes for $1500, which means the Lexus struts are twice as much as the ones he wants to use. I understand OEM parts are higher, especially when it comes to fancy rides, but twice as much? She needs tires any way, so I'm inclined to let my tire man do new tires and new rear struts only. What am I missing? Is there any reason I should pony up double for the Lexus struts? I don't want to waste money, but I want it done right. The admiral loves her little Lexus. Thoughts?