Ok don't shoot me!

NickHansen

Cadet
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Messages
27
Yes I know there are many debates about who's better Eldebrock or Holly..... I just need some advice towards my set up. Ok so for all you performance junkies out there, any one got experience with these carbs? Got it narrowed down to three. The Edelbrock Marine Carburetor 1410 750CFM, the Holley 770 CFM ALUMINUM MARINE AVENGER CARBURETOR, and the AED Performance 750 HM Marine.....so give me the good the bad and the ugly. Looking for ease of setup out of the box and easy long term care and maintenance. Was so going to just do a DP but was told the Elde would be so much easier.
 

Attachments

  • photo264075.jpeg
    photo264075.jpeg
    25.7 KB · Views: 0
  • photo264076.jpeg
    photo264076.jpeg
    30.8 KB · Views: 0
  • photo264077.jpeg
    photo264077.jpeg
    105 KB · Views: 0

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
71,244
The Edelbrock Marine Carburetor 1410 750CFM,

Ayuh,.... I Love the ole Carter AFB carbs, 'n don't do Holleys,...
 

Scott Danforth

Grumpy Vintage Moderator still playing with boats
Staff member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
50,774
700 cfm is more than the 383 can draw in
 

alldodge

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
42,960
Only if it stays within the norm. Increase the rpms and the cfm's go up
 

Scott Danforth

Grumpy Vintage Moderator still playing with boats
Staff member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
50,774
Correct, however unless the 383 is spinning over 5800 rpm, it cant draw more than 700 cfm
 

boatman37

Lieutenant
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
1,273
As far as ease of tuning the Edelbrock is by far the easiest to work on (not that the Holley is hard. The Holley pictured looks like vacuum secondaries. You can get away with a little more CFM with vacuum secondaries but I am speaking from an automotive background where 5000-7000 RPM's is typical. The 3rd one pictured appears to be a customized Holley. I'm sure the cost is up there and probably overkill. Personally I would probably go with the Edelbrock but probably more of a coin toss. What I don't like about either is they are square bore. A properly set up spread bore is more fuel efficient and generally has better throttle response. For that reason I like my q-jets. I had a 1979 GMC 1/2 ton 4x4 with a 350 that I built. I had a q-jet on it and on a whim replaced it with a brand new Edelbrock and could never get the gas mileage out of the Edelbrock that I did with the q-jet. My Holleys I didn't care about fuel mileage so it didn't matter. Most of those were on 500-700HP engines.
 
Top