Re: Re-pitch prop or buy another one?
I just went through a prop experiment with my rig, which is a similar size/displacement/design to yours...
I settled with a turbo1 22p three blade...
here were my candidates and what I got out of them, fwiw:
20p four blade Michigan Wheel aluminum 14" - I wonder if this thing was truly 20p or just had massive flex, because I hit the rev limiter on my 4.3 at 5200RPM.. It was mighty quick out of the hole, and didn't provide a lot of bow lift, or maybe it did but evened it out with stern lift.. I suggest that it flexed under power to around 18p.. I hit somewhere around 38mph, iirc, with an alpha genII 1.81:1 outdrive... I could hold plane @ 25~2600RPM and just over 15mph.. that was great for sipping fuel..
23p four blade solas amita(sp?)4 aluminum 14.25".. couldn't hit but 4300rpm.. around 43ish WOT.. slow out of the hole... mid range was strong, but wanted to fall off plane around 3300rpm/26ishMPH.. hit around 3kRPM when popping it hard out of the hole, and off idle.. it would struggle there until it bit in and planed around 6~7 seconds.. too much prop..
22p 14.25" 3blade s/s turbo1 vented with a visibly highly progressive blade- those vents are important... engine spools MUCHO faster out of the hole, nailing 37~3800RPM where the 23p would only hit 3kRPM, putting me deeper into the engines power-band, which allowed even further revving.. Hit 46~4700RPM WOT @ 45~47mph.. happy with this props geometry and those vents make a big difference.. even though it feels like it's going to drop off plane, it will hold it down to just shy of 3kRPM @ 24ish MPH... good for cruising, no?
I would be best served, if I cared to spend a few more dollars, to get a 21p with duplicate blade geometry as the 22p turbo I'm currently running... but the 22p is fine, and close enough...
^all of that to say: the game of proper propping is just as much about blade geometry as it is pitch, rake, cup, diameter- when you're dialing it in.. those vents allow me to spool up that 22p faster than even the 20p out of the hole, which allows a slightly bigger pitch to be used.. w/o those vents, this conversation would be much different..
manufacturers state the average pitch on a progressively pitched prop, but not the 'ramp' of the pitch- so the difference between two props marked the same from two different makers can be substantial- the michigan wheel, visibly, had less progressive ramp than the turbo1.. the cupping on the turbo1 somewhat matched the mw in overall height, but the ramp to achieve that height took place over a much longer distance.. tricky, no?
anyway, I just wanted to pile on some more variables you may want to take note of while making your selection.