Re: the skinny on narrow boats
This is my experience of my narrow boat and for me it is the best. I bought it new. 1968 FD Alumacraft, 14 ft. semi-v, bare bones utility with soft round chine. 4 ft. wide at the transom (aqueduct transom). Boat only is 207 lbs.
I run it with a 4 hp., 25 hp. and 40 hp. The boat will plane with 4 hp., but me alone. The more weight you put in the boat the more hp. is needed to plane it and to go faster, because a narrow boat is always more in the water. A similar wider boat needs less hp. to do the same.
A boat should be dimensioned for how and where you intend to use it the most. Bigger may not be better. Boats are compromises, with many advantages and disadvantages of wide versus narrow and big versus small.
Some performance advantages of a narrow boat are a smoother ride and it will corner better than a wider boat of the same style. It is inherently a more rigid boat and has less stress put on it when used hard because of the narrow width. It will handle rough water better, track more solid and is less likely to kite in wind or when going airborne. After all is said,a narrow boat can be powered to go fast.
I owned bigger and wider boats but always go back to this boat. A compromise that suits me best and it's so easy to use.
Here are pics. and running the motors. It is rated for 40 hp. and a thrill to drive. The Mercury was the only brand that had a short shaft.