The distance to the shore or other boats is irrelevant.
It is the distance to the receiving stations that counts!
30 boats within a mile doesn't help if they don't have radios, or they are not turned ON.
You are introducing non-technical considerations into the discussion. When one inquires about making radio contact with another boat, there is an assumption that the other boat has a radio, and is monitoring. If you have a radio on your boat, in the USA you are required to maintain a radio watch on Channel 16, and, if a DSC radio, the radio also maintains a radio watch on the DSC channel. When you install a VHF Marine Band radio on a boat, even as a voluntary installation, you are still subject to the regulations to maintain a mandatory radio watch.
Your argument that there is no relevance to the distance between your boat and other boat for radio communication is wrong. Your argument is based on human elements. One could invent all sorts of human elements that could preclude communication taking place. For example, the other boat might not understand the language you are speaking. That does not mean your radio signal did not reach his boat.
Radio coverage for shore stations for an agency like the Coast Guard of the USA is clearly shown in their coverage maps. The goal of the RESCUE 21 project is to provide coverage to at least 20-miles offshore. If you have knowledge of a gap in that coverage that occurs within 2-kilometers of shore, you should point out that location. Otherwise you seem to just be inventing out of thin air the notion that it is possible for a gap in the coverage to exist when very close to shore. Your invention of that claim does not really substantiate it. After spending almost $1-billion on this radio system, I doubt there are any coverage gaps because a boat is too close to shore.