Flux Marine Outboard Engines . . .

Scott Danforth

Grumpy Vintage Moderator still playing with boats
Staff member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
51,399
. . "and they so easily get stuck in the mud"
there was a picture of my Great Grandfather from 1910 or 1911 pulling a Ford out of the ditch with a team of plow horses in Raymond South Dakota.

He was 100 at the time and could not remember the exact year.

Probably similar conversations were happening 120 years ago
so close to the 120 years ago
 

rolmops

Vice Admiral
Joined
Feb 24, 2002
Messages
5,589
I do sense a little of mistrust of new and potentially better systems of energy creation.
Let's not forget that the only way to get alternatives to what we know is an energy source that pollutes and poisons is trial and error.
I think that in 20 or 30 years from now, gasoline engines on boats with their prohibitive price tag, will be on the way out and electric or otherwise fueled alternatives will be the popular thing.
I hope to live and see the day that my grand kids will take me out on their non polluting boats.
As for "coal powered" those power stations have been closing shop or been converted to natural gas and then closed, for years now. Like it or not, but solar and wind energy get bigger all the time while coal gets smaller. Conservative has to do with conservation so lets work on that.
 
Last edited:

racerone

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Messages
38,991
Battery packs are dangerous enuff in cars.----Can you imagine the stress on a battery pack if boat is pounding through a 1 or 2 foot chop.----No thanks for me.
 

kd4pbs

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
298
Facts are not political. Well, at least when we're talking about scientific facts.
Solar and wind is a non-starter simply because of the short life cycle and vast amount of fossil fuels required to build them. They're a great example of hypocritical technology accelerated and promoted only by those who benefit from their proliferation. Nuclear power and hydroelectric power is the only path forward in an all-electric world, but fossil fuels are the least impactful and longest-lasting resource to bridge that gap. And even then, that's assuming a viable form of energy storage technology is discovered in the future, as there are none out there today.
I used to be one that believed in the "green" movement, and that those naysayers about "green" tech were just zealots. Then I used logic, common sense, and an open mind to discover the truth. I guess it was an epiphany I had as a result of realizing how the movement was about power and politics as opposed to science brought to light to me by the fact that there were a couple of key and popular useful idiots in that movement that were 100% wrong in their predictions about what would happen in years that have since come and gone without incident. Cognitive dissonance is a real thing.
If you don't wish to do the same, that's your prerogative, and I respect your opinion. And if you show me that you believe your opinion outweighs established facts, I appreciate it; it's good to weed out the noise from the truth - just like all those who have been tricked into believing that CO2 is a bad thing, and that it's the #1 greenhouse gas in the atmosphere.
 

Pmt133

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Messages
1,039
Everything poses an entirely different environmental impact depending on technology. As technology evolves so does our knowledge. Science is Science, facts are facts and the technology is out there and now we have to deal with it as it evolves.

I hope I'm dead long before I have to deal with the problems we've created in the last 20 years.
 

kd4pbs

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
298
Indeed. However minor, humans have an impact on the Earth by simply existing. So do the animals, trees, weather, and literally the Earth.
The line really should be drawn in front of those who wish to "Save the Earth" (as if it is a human or a living, sentient being) at the cost of humanity. If they want to live off-grid in a shack, I support their right to do so 100%. The problem is they want to force that on others. They would diminish the standards of living for everyone to fulfill their ideals. That's not science, that's just a mental health disease.
And yes - there is a line on the other side which should not be crossed as well. If you think it's a good thing to dump your hazardous waste down the storm drain, then you're a jerk and deserve prison time and fines commensurate with the cost of the cleanup.
 

racerone

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Messages
38,991
You do not pay for electrify as you use it.----The bill comes in at the end of the month.----Most folks know little about electricity.-----I say to random people that you can go to the local hardware store and buy a 5 HP generator.----You can make electricity by burning gasoline , lots of it for the power you get.-------Then I ask the question about the local powerplant.----I ask how much power it takes to turn the generator there. -----Most common guess is 10,000 HP.-----Fact is it takes over 1,000,000 HP.-----It simply boggles the mind of these people.
 

cyclops222

Commander
Joined
Mar 21, 2024
Messages
2,915
How do the GREEN people supply power during storms, night time and no wind?
Why is green power so expensive ?
Who / what is going to make up the lost power from low water levels at the largest power dams ?
 
Last edited:
Top