1977 9.9 johnson

wrmdunker

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
170
Hello All,

Looking to buy this Model number 10EL77A. Cowling has a ding on the underside that was epoxied. Mark is located above a silver disc/plug on the block about 3/4 inch dia. What is this plug (starboard side) and would it have blown and cracked the cowling?

Any thoughts would be appreciated and/or personal experience with this motor. Block looks very clean, good hoses, good coil housings and good pee stream.

Thanks

WD
 

raczekp1

Lieutenant
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,327
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

this silver plug is ID tag, the same as is on transom(its a copy).
this is model and number stamped.
try copmpresion test.
3 puls on each spark plug hole give you compresion readings.
100 psi or more means ok
60 psi means powerhead cals for rebuild
 

wrmdunker

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
170
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

Thanks for the info. Any knowledge on the function of this plug and why or if it could have blown?
 

raczekp1

Lieutenant
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,327
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

this plug cant be blown.under this plug is floating water to cool down cylinders.so the preasur is only 5 psi or so.
this plug can be removed only in mechanical way.
only one purpuse in removing is to hide ID numbers.
the best info you wil find in http://www.sschapterpsa.com/ramblings/Ramblings.html
go down at the botom of this page
 

Rick.

Captain
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
3,740
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

EL designates an electric start with a long lower unit. Do you require the 20inch lower unit? If not I would pass on it. Best of luck. Rick.
 

wrmdunker

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
170
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

raczekp1: Nice website. Thanks. I have a lot of reading to do.

Rick: I hadn't thought about the shaft lenght. Its mounted on a 16 foot jon boat and my son wants it for shooting carp in shallow water... Also has a 55 pound thrust bow mount for tight spots so he may have to tilt the Johnson in shallow water. A 15 inch may be better. Will the 20 affect how it handles?

WD
 

Rick.

Captain
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
3,740
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

Yes it will affect it negatively. For a john boat I would want a 15 inch not a 20. I'd keep looking or you can convert it to a 15. I think the only purchase would have to be a new drive shaft as the lower unit has a five inch extention you can pull out and then cut five inces from the water tube. Never done this but lots have. Leeroy has built a superb website and he probably has an article about converting the shaft length. Rick.
 

JDusza

Ensign
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
973
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

It's not the length of the boat it's the height of the transom; 15" or 20".

With a 15 " transom DO NOT use a 20" engine shaft. It is extremely dangerous!!! I assume you love your son and want to keep him!!!!

The longer shaft puts the prop lower in the water which extends the moment arm of torque (of the boat/engine as a pair) and this will tip the boat when steering and THROW YOU OUT; especially on hole shots. If you turn the engine before you gun it, you'll be in trouble. The prop needs to be close to the hull. You want the anti-cav plate to be about an inch off the hull.

If you are hell bent to go this route, wire in a kill switch that attaches to your body it. You really shouldn't fool around with this.

Also, in converting long shaft to short shaft you need a shorter water tube, check; a shorter drive shaft, check; AND a shorter shift rod. With these parts the conversion is easy.

All the best,
J
 
Last edited:

wrmdunker

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
170
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

Well I went to take another look at the boat/motor and to my surprise it has a 20 inch transom. Big boat and they may not make them like this anymore. Its a Monark 1652 and the deck is 52 inches wide. Boat is rated for 1100 pounds. So seems like the long shaft is correct. I didn't want to get into cutting it down. The shaft alone was $163. Thanks to all for the input. I pulled the trigger on the combo. Will post pics soon.
 

Solittle

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Apr 28, 2002
Messages
7,518
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

It's not the length of the boat it's the height of the transom; 15" or 20".

With a 15 " transom DO NOT use a 20" engine shaft. It is extremely dangerous!!! I assume you love your son and want to keep him!!!!

The longer shaft puts the prop lower in the water which extends the moment arm of torque (of the boat/engine as a pair) and this will tip the boat when steering and THROW YOU OUT; especially on hole shots. If you turn the engine before you gun it, you'll be in trouble. The prop needs to be close to the hull. You want the anti-cav plate to be about an inch off the hull.

If you are hell bent to go this route, wire in a kill switch that attaches to your body it. You really shouldn't fool around with this.

Also, in converting long shaft to short shaft you need a shorter water tube, check; a shorter drive shaft, check; AND a shorter shift rod. With these parts the conversion is easy.

All the best,
J

I must assume that you have had a problem running a 20" engine on a 15" transom. I have that set up with my 75 9.9 and it operates just fine and not as you have said " It is extremely dangerous!!! It my not be the "desired" set-up but works for me.
 

JDusza

Ensign
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
973
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

I wouldn't do it and I wouldn't recommend it.
Peace, out.
J
 

wrmdunker

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
170
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

Well our 2012 season is over and the boat is put away. Had a lot of outings with it and just needed to say that the boat and motor are an awesome combination. Very stable even with 3 adults at WOT.
 

Rick.

Captain
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
3,740
Re: 1977 9.9 johnson

That's great news. Sounds like you got a good outfit. Rick.
 
Top