Alpheus
Lieutenant Commander
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2009
- Messages
- 1,759
Re: Cold air intake
Post # 5
who are you quoting? I don't see that...
Post # 5
who are you quoting? I don't see that...
my engine, before putting the afr heads on it, would pick up 300-400 rpms with the gaffrig flame arrestor that's on it versus the stock one. I did it more than once to be sure. Required a step richer jetting as well. The stock flame arrestors for most boats are restrictive. note that often times when you change something like that, to realize the performance benefit that might be possible, you may have to adjust the fuel mixture (ie jetting). when you flow more air, you need more fuel...
Just my own experience. My corvette really benefited from a cold air intake... this post has me thinking...
Yes, I certainly agree that you would have to adj the carb to get those type of gains, or it was way off to start with.
I'd bet that even before your afr head change, we are not talking a stock engne?![]()
What you are suggesting is that the new flame arrester increased cfm by 30 or 40, which sounds reasonable. What doesn't seem reasonable to me, is the calculation of the flow of a stock arrester to lower the carbs cfm that much. It only takes about 500cfm for a 350 @ 5000 rpms at 100% eff. So, if you only had a 600cfm carb on it or larger, says the stock arrester could only flow 500 max. Or am I missing something?