Foley revisited?... not quite.

[QC]

Re: Foley revisited?... not quite.

Well this is interesting . . . Hello hello hello ello ello lo lo lo lo o o o . . .

 

[WillyBWright]

Re: Foley revisited?... not quite.

If he were a US senator, there would be a lot more attention. South Dakota? Where the heck is South Dakota? You mean people actually live there? They actually have their own government? If it weren't for Mt. Rushmore, nobody would ever stop. It's just a state to drive through while going someplace else.

( Yes South Dakotans, I'm kidding. )

 

[SoulWinner]

Re: Foley revisited?... not quite.

Exactly, I would never had slept in the same bed with any guy at 17.....
......

Sounds like someone is little insecure....

 

[Haut Medoc]

Re: Foley revisited?... not quite.

Whatever.....
I didn't have any brothers & I'm sure sleeping with another man would make my skin crawl..:%
...Unless it was out of utter necessity....(Like sharing a foxhole)
SW, your avatar suggests that you may have something more to share with the forum...HMMMMMM?..:$

 

[treedancer]

Re: Foley revisited?... not quite.

Quote pointer94


yet not one liberal will drop the kool-aid long enough to admonish bad behavior that hinders their political agenda.


BAD Sutten,BAD<VERY BAD Sutton……there Pointer consider State Senator Sutton admonished.


Now that we have looked under the rocks in S. Dakota, and found a Democrat perv you can be assured that this thread will come popping out in the future. Who knows it might be some Republican alderman in, a burg town in Podunk but rest assured it will be book marked.

 

[POINTER94]

Re: Foley revisited?... not quite.

Come on Tree, It is the double standard based on the Foley case. This is on point. But to the alderman who is a child preditor, string him up. The problem lies in the end of the world mentality exibited by the press and democrats regarding Foley, and when the EXACT or WORSE example dirties the democrats house, there are those who would ignore or try to mitigate the situation to the detriment of their principals.

I don't remember anyone defending Foley here. I know what my response was and that was to send him to the big house if guilty. I do remember that wall to wall, 24 hour coverage of the Foley case in the MSM during an election. I do remember questioning their sincerety regarding the event in light of the MSM's ability to ingore worse situations in the past regarding liberals. An here, within months of the Foley issue, a far more agregious situation and LITTLE OR NO COVERAGE OR PUBLIC OUTCRY. This is a double standard. And any attempt to provide cover for or mitigate this sicko simply validates the double standard many of us have been pointing out for years. Providing anything but distain for this creep makes me question anyones motives. How can anyone who defends this creep, have any credibility regarding crimes against children, or their desire for a fair but equal coverage from the MSM? Calling a sick jerk what he is even if it works against you takes guts. Not much, but some. Show you have some.

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: Foley revisited?... not quite.

Speaking as a nearly life long resident of "Gay Bay North", I've found that Libs and Democrats, and many "Moderates" look the other way, or actually rejoice when there is a li'l criminal activity or perversion, (hard to be 'perverted' in this town), bribery or any activity that Cornservatives don't like or will not tolerate. I'll bet Seattle is actually to the right of many mid sized to large cities like: Madison WI, n' all, Seattle is jus' a little better known for bein' BRIGHT BLUE, here on the left coast n' all!. They, (Libs Progressives, etc), generally re-elect and promote to positions of power those who engage in the above mentioned activity(s). Heck: jus' cornsider ol' Algore nearly becomin' Pres in '00. He jus' took li'l lunch bags, (many many bags) o' $5,000.00 from Chinese Monks, (aren't Monks comitted to poverty or am I jus' dreamin' here)? Jus' a coinsidence that ol' Bernie Swartz fixed the Chinese rockets 'n all: right guys? There are sooooo many examples from local politics all the way up to Slick Willy of Dems trolling with blatent criminal activity or perversion jus' to p*** o** cornservatives sooooo the MSM can label 'em "MEAN SPIRITED" and wup 'em in the pols. That's modern America Gents! Glad to hear you're not a Pirate Bro Haut!8):$:%JR ps: never thought you were anyway Bro.

 

[SoulWinner]

Re: Foley revisited?... not quite.

Haut,

Yes, I voted for Pedro:^