Re: FWC or closed cooling?
There is no replacement for closed cooling. <br /><br />It is the closest thing to an automotive application that the engine was designed to run in. Marine engines (modern-automotive based) were never designed to run at 160-180 degrees. 200+ is far more forgiving, on the engine-believe or not.<br /><br />It's no different than putting a 160 degree thermostat in your 2005 Chevy/Ford/Dodge pickup. Doing so, in your truck, sends your engine managemnent system into constant state of confusion. Thus it reverts back to its programmed "limp mode". That reverts to lots of fuel used with NO performance boost. The OEM engineers are smarter than the hacks selling so called "performance" parts. Again, believe it, or not.<br /><br />A dry stack is just that. Dry exhaust, NOT water cooled. Dry stacks/exhaust REQUIRE lots of open area, for cooling, with NOTHING flamable in close proximaty.