Re: Is Anybody as Stress Out as Me?
Agreed on the constant change. The hardest thing to swallow are a couple of really bad things in the law that were put in in such a way, there is almost zero chance for many companies to make it (only a few will remain in the end). Backed the companies into a corner that will bleed them dry until the capital runs out or more aptly companies find other places for their capital. There is change and then there is just nonsensical word on paper and unfortunately we got the nonsensical words on paper. Change is fine but if the change requires you to walk into oncoming traffic, that is a problem. I truly thought cooler heads would prevail here. In this particular case I hate to be so sure of the trainwreck that is on the way. History will be the judge here.
And again I will say the industry as a whole (insurance and medical) had decades to correct it themselves and refused to do so. To pretend this all came as a surprise is disingenuous at best. No matter how you look at it health care in the US is the most expensive in the world but ranks something like 34th. in quality. I am not just measuring that in dollars spent but as a percentage of the country?s GDP, it?s far higher than any country in the world. How Rx drugs are priced alone is a disgrace and in my mind borders on criminal. Yes I know, they need to charge this much to support R&D... BULL, the three biggest pharma companies in the US spend three times (or more) on advertizing (Think Cialis and the Blue Pill) than they do on R&D and that doesn?t take into account the fact most of that R&D happens in universities at tax payer expense and approval testing is done by the FDA, again at tax payer expense.
Please don?t think what you are seeing is anything new because it isn?t. When OSHA went into effect in 1970 manufactures across the country wailed to the heavens it was going to drive them all out of business. The ?pesky? regs. was just too much to deal with and would mean many had to rebuild their manufacturing systems. They too had a litany of excuses, reasons, cited complexity and even conflicts in the regs. In truth, they were right in one respect, it did in fact put some manufactures out of business and many investors looked for green pastures. However in the long run they were replaced by companies that took up the challenge and did what needed to be done and every factory worker's life in the US is better and safer for it. By the way, the American Manufactures Association was just like your industry, they knew it was coming, refused to self correct and cried to high heaven when they were forced to reshape the industry saying the law makers were cluess about the subject.
Bottom line, the only constant in life is change and to succeed you have to change with it or, well you won?t be in the job / company very long. By the way, I tell my manufacturing clients the same thing. Railing against change is no more effective than tilting at wind mills and only eats up time and resources because once change is in motion there is no way to stop it and go backwards. The world just doesn?t work that way and to my way of thinking that?s a good thing.
Agreed on the constant change. The hardest thing to swallow are a couple of really bad things in the law that were put in in such a way, there is almost zero chance for many companies to make it (only a few will remain in the end). Backed the companies into a corner that will bleed them dry until the capital runs out or more aptly companies find other places for their capital. There is change and then there is just nonsensical word on paper and unfortunately we got the nonsensical words on paper. Change is fine but if the change requires you to walk into oncoming traffic, that is a problem. I truly thought cooler heads would prevail here. In this particular case I hate to be so sure of the trainwreck that is on the way. History will be the judge here.