Frowned upon yes, not certain it's actually against the law.
http://dnr.wi.gov/files/PDF/pubs/LE/LE0301.pdf
No question that the motor you already own is the one you're likely to use! I make sure to run my boat at WOT every time I take her out, at least for a while, just to maintain engine health. Most of us can't afford to run WOT all the time!!! If I had a 200 instead of a 115, I would certainly still do that - but my boat IS rated for 200. As an engineer, I over-design the hell out of everything I design and build, but I can't vouch for any boat manufacturer, who has to balance cost against performance. That's a tricky balancing act, and more than one manufacturer has gone belly-up because their cost-cutting went too far.
Interestingly, the Mercury 60, 75, 90 and 115 are all THE SAME MOTOR, with different programming in the ECU. Arguably, you could "detune" that 200 to limit it to 150 HP, if it were a real concern (and this case it might be). I suppose that just limiting the RPMs (with that manual limiter - the throttle) would be sufficient.
Here's where it gets real stupid: in 1982 Mercury changed their horsepower ratings from the crankshaft to the propshaft. This means the 150hp became 115hp. Now it's not overpowered anymore with the same engine. :facepalm: (though, nobody changed how boats were rated) Also, the same 6 cylinder engine was available in 90 or 115 horsepower...so the exact same engine weight as the 150. I could put "900" stickers on my 150hp and nobody would ever know the difference.
So, by that line of thinking, if you were in need of repowering your boat, you could buy a newer 115, and it would run just as fast as your current 150? No way.
The truth is, hp loss by rating at the prop is less than 10%, and 10% is also the NMMA fudge factor in determining hp. That is, a 100 hp motor must produce between 90 and 110 hp to wear the 100 hp label.
This time they changed the 140hp to 115hp. They never detuned the motor.
Where did you get your info sir?
I ask because I had an '88 115 with a Laser 24P prop on an 18' Ranger BB and on my first trip out with the new boat I was up to 55 and things started to get unstable; chine walking. Had throttle left and shut her down before I got a tach reading. Prop slip calculator at 15% says about 5500.
After the outing I changed props for more of a general purpose prop, a Laser 19 , but at that it would still do mid 40's at 6k rpm. Besides that same boat would pop me up on a slalom at my 250#.....course the prop was ported.
A lot of whoopie for a 115.
Mark
View attachment 187509View attachment 187510View attachment 187511View attachment 187512View attachment 187513
You know: Everyone here gets all bent out of shape by this simple question and yet they ALL ignore the simple fact that the liability always lies with the ACTIONS of the operator. A 300 HP engine is not going to have an accident or kill someone unless the operator does something stupid. Yes, there will always be the relatively rare occurrence where someone else does something stupid but the liability is on them.
However, understand that with the overpowered boat you ARE opening yourself to the possibility of increased hassling
Back in the 70s, insurance companies started to increase premiums for "Muscle cars." I read an official report on "cheaters." The insurance company stand was that those who paid were covered and those who lied about the horsepower of their cars were MORE LIKELY to be more careful drivers-- in any case, the insurance company wins!
Power the boat with your 200 engine (you probably are going to anyway) BUT be certain that the structure is sound and don't use the horsepower in speeding through congested areas.
Here is a boat originally rated for probably about 40. It is now rated for 85 (don't ask and I won't tell). It is powered with a 125 soon to be 140. It is highly modified to take the horsepower and is a safe ride (relatively speaking) BUT----I don't use it during heavy traffic days. Notice in the photos that the water is smooth and you don't see any other boats.
" Too much horsepower is never enough"
"Professionals" are wrong all the time. There are opinions here for both sides, and both from apparently well educated people. Just because you don't agree with one doesn't make it wrong. The OP has to "ignore" one side or the other.This is one of the most frequently asked questions around here, and most every time the OP ignores all of the "professional opinions".
That's definitely one man's opinion...validate what is already suspected to be a bad idea.
I would never ever ever ever do anything major on the advice of one single doctor. I limp when I walk because I took the advice of one doctor who nearly killed me. A "professional", who I paid a lot of money to be completely wrong...If your doctor's professional opinion was to get test A because you have a family history of disease B would you ignore him too?