I dont know... thats why i was asking if it would be ok to use that. The more i hear about this stuff the more i think to just use exterior grade instead... i went to home depot for something else yesterday and looked at some of the exterior grade... price is not much different roughly 40 bucks a sheet. that may be my best course of action.So are you using two layers of double sided MDO to make a transom? Which would replace two inside layers of ply with the exterior finish layers instead of the structural layers of ply?
From the MDO i saw at the lumber yard it was not special marine ply, just regular MDO with finished surface on both sidesAre you using the specially made marine ply with the MDO surface mentioned in the pdf or just the regular ply core?
A tabbed and bedded in stringer is not spanning a distance. A span is like a bridge, the distance unsupported between two points. So that shouldn't rule the product out for use as stringers.
The outer layer of MDO not being designed as a structural layer, but as an appearance layer should be considered in all applications.
As should wether or not you want to use the marine specific layers or just the exterior grade layers inside.
Then I guess you'd have to consider if it's the structure, if the laminate as a whole using the MDO as core is or if in fact you wanted to just go ahead and use more layers of 1708 to make fiberglass stringers using the MDO as extra strength left over inside your fiberglass stringers.
The more it gets discussed the less uses I actually see in using it though.
I tnink NSB is correct. The core does not matter as much as the fiberglass.
I stand corrected. The Glass IS what provides the overall strength to the stringer system, not core material. You can and some have even used cardboard in the past. I apologize for dis-remembering this important fact. Thanks for helping over this Old-timers moment. But as always to have to remember I am just an...
![]()
When I called up the Rep for MDO he said the Surface layer is ready to accept Most resin coatings/builds.
Yes .. as a structural coating. From what I understand the paper backing is Completely compatible with Poly or Epoxy post lams.
The coating itself is ready to accept 70% of New Bond Coatings.. It is NOT a saturated coating that you have to do any other prep for..apply your new coatings right out of the box.
This will depend on what application we are talking about.. The core Does matter in most cases. its just How it affects your build that is a variable. .. foam/board/wood..etc ..
No..I think you were right on..No reason to stand corrected..
YD.
So your saying the rep told you it was a structural layer and it made sense to layer it in your laminate? This is contrary to the pdf's info. Which makes you wonder why they don't use more layers of it in the product, except for that it's an appearance layer.
Did he tell you to special order the marine version of MDO?
How is this layer supposed to be better than a board with all exterior plys?Got me mate LOL .. I never said/suggested that MDO was "better" than other ply builds.
Dont get me wrong here .. If you look in the archives I was the first one to suggest NOT to use MDO when another member was introducing its use as a "possible" alternative. I suggested that More data was needed to fully understand how and where MDO could be used for Any application in our restorations.
Im not suggesting its use at all.. I am trying to point out that MY personal investigation on using this material does have qualifications for marine use.
I dont see any specific reason to use 'alternative' board such as MDO .. but I think ( after consideration and consultation ) that the Material Can be used without harm.
But..if you ask me .. MG is still the best of the best..
YD.
PS. I hope WOG feels vindicated now..
Oh so it would seem were all running out of reasons to use this product.
Yeah I remember you saying you didn't think it was a good choice, I just keep seeing it brought up so I wanted to give the idea some thought.