Re: No comments on Libby?
12ftr. who leaked what to which media? by the time line of phone calls seems either Rove called cooper first or libby called miller first but cooper wrote it and novak reported it. why is that anti-american? Rove and Libby were out to smoke a critic. Valeri was treated as collateral damage. but whats absolutly hilarious is the critic they sought to damage and discredit was entirely correct along with German and israli and white house intel. seems the only few that were wrong are now involved in legal problems.<br /> seems if some says the emporer has no clothes they get zapped.<br /> you should really read a few of the above links. I tend to disregard most from partisan sites and try to stick with ones that just show facts or the facts as the documents provided,not just reported, state. why would Bush or Cheney need intel on a mid level covert operative that has a sole connection to the critic they were attempting to discredit ?<br /> that is one of the spots Rove and Libby are in. everyone knows a mid level beurocrat cant autherize travel vouchers and such and they all had the power to pick up the phone and call the travel supervisor and ask, Who autherized wilsons trip/. no need to involve anyone else. none what so ever.<br /> other than 2 or more persons employed by the govt attempted to make life difficult. that is covered under a federal code in the above mentioned links. only it gives you the expanded version of what is a federal conspiracy in that case as well.<br /> it does make for some good reading, much better than novak or newsweek.<br /> and just like watergate or clintongate if the parties involved had not INTENTIONALY lied and obstructed justice and tampered with evidence they would have waled away happy. nixons only 2 crimes were attempting to cover something up that he had really nothing to do with and getting caught doing it by lying.<br /> had slick willie just said yep got me a snooker in the oval office, next question please, it would have ended there. but by lying and all knew it, they made a life of proving the lie. that is what was shameful, not the dogged rooting of a liar but the fact the liar was in the highest office. <br /> myself I think clinton should have got 10 years or so in the big house. we have to hold any elected or appointed people on the public dole to standards higher than the average Joe.
12ftr. who leaked what to which media? by the time line of phone calls seems either Rove called cooper first or libby called miller first but cooper wrote it and novak reported it. why is that anti-american? Rove and Libby were out to smoke a critic. Valeri was treated as collateral damage. but whats absolutly hilarious is the critic they sought to damage and discredit was entirely correct along with German and israli and white house intel. seems the only few that were wrong are now involved in legal problems.<br /> seems if some says the emporer has no clothes they get zapped.<br /> you should really read a few of the above links. I tend to disregard most from partisan sites and try to stick with ones that just show facts or the facts as the documents provided,not just reported, state. why would Bush or Cheney need intel on a mid level covert operative that has a sole connection to the critic they were attempting to discredit ?<br /> that is one of the spots Rove and Libby are in. everyone knows a mid level beurocrat cant autherize travel vouchers and such and they all had the power to pick up the phone and call the travel supervisor and ask, Who autherized wilsons trip/. no need to involve anyone else. none what so ever.<br /> other than 2 or more persons employed by the govt attempted to make life difficult. that is covered under a federal code in the above mentioned links. only it gives you the expanded version of what is a federal conspiracy in that case as well.<br /> it does make for some good reading, much better than novak or newsweek.<br /> and just like watergate or clintongate if the parties involved had not INTENTIONALY lied and obstructed justice and tampered with evidence they would have waled away happy. nixons only 2 crimes were attempting to cover something up that he had really nothing to do with and getting caught doing it by lying.<br /> had slick willie just said yep got me a snooker in the oval office, next question please, it would have ended there. but by lying and all knew it, they made a life of proving the lie. that is what was shameful, not the dogged rooting of a liar but the fact the liar was in the highest office. <br /> myself I think clinton should have got 10 years or so in the big house. we have to hold any elected or appointed people on the public dole to standards higher than the average Joe.
