(Prop Help??) 115 Mercury on a 14' Cobra Cat Tunnel Hull

Faztbullet

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
15,931
These motors are had to get set up for use in a HP application due to RPM limitations(fly apart @6000rpm) and water intake location. The location(too far forward) prevents engine from being raised to reduced drag. A nosecone with low water pickup will need to be added...

115l.jpg
 

Dukedog

Captain
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
3,446
thanks Faz.. that info on motor and gear case would be a deal breaker for goin much 'faster..

sounds like ya gonna need ta be very carefull with height, prop selection and rpm, with THAT motor....... i see a v6 in your future maybe?... even a "little" 2.0 motor!
 

rjcamel2355

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Messages
221
I happen to have a 2.0 laying around that needs new rings, this may be my motivation to complete that project..... I appreciate the input guys, it's always nice to get some advice from people who have done things like this, and not just a "maybe in a perfect world if you..." answer.
 

Texasmark

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
14,786
I bought a New 1989 Ranger Fisherman (bass boat padded hull, reasonable dead rise at the transom) with a 1989 (titled, some say 1988 was the last year for the tower but my title said '89) 115 I6, Merc 19P ported and cupped Laser SS prop, for 7 years and sold it to my BIL. I did most of my traveling alone, on the pad at WOT regardless of water conditions, unless really rough, trimmed out as far as I could before before speed started falling off, hearing the engine singing, and the thumping of the prop's blades hitting the surface of the water at a solid 6000 rpm. All that I changed over the years was the water jacket cover on the rear of the block once, and the surface gap spark plugs once; nothing else. Last I heard he still had the rig. There was no GPS at that time so I don't know how fast I was going as speedometers are usually in error but it was in the 50 region. That engine didn't have OT alarm so if I was running her dry, I didn't know it. I didn't have a jackplate and the engine was firmly mounted to the transom, but the way Ranger built that hull, there was about a 3" setback from the rear of the pad to the transom rear surface.

Why did I post this? Just a data point for what worked for me. Maybe I was just lucky. I didn't have an affinity for changing impellers back then either, on any of my engines going back to the late '50's.....1956 Scott Atwater Gold Top (green bottom) 10 hp, first engine dad bought new. Didn't know any better obviously, but never cost me an engine. That poor Scott, I ran it a lot in a barrel and I don't know how many times I hung it on a fence and ran it dry for a few minutes. Impeller was surely in horrible shape but it always ran and ran strong.....for a 10 hp Scott.
 

Dukedog

Captain
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
3,446
it is!.. glad ya put that up.. like said, not much on tha inline 4's.... that little thing really likes a well set up, stem winder v6 anyway....... should still be fun even with his little motor!
 
Top