Rummy vs the Generals

POINTER94

Vice Admiral
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Messages
5,031
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

What an interesting thread. I called out Clinton for gutting the military in a previous thread and the apologists jumped to support his non-legacy. Unfortunately thats exactly what he did. Gutted the military, intellegence community, and national security. Bush hasn't done much better but has the benefit of a war to move things forward. 18R pointed to 17 generals who quit because Clinton was gutting the military, (I know it never happened) but where was the alphabet media digging them up for news specials, and public retritbution?<br /><br />Now I hear there is NO WAY for a military victory in Iraq. We took almost all of europe and we can't take Iraq? What we can't do is take it under the freak show media's version of a bloodless war. Burn, blow up, quarantine, catalog, thin out the enemy, level cities like Faluja to the ground, curfews, land mines, phone taps, surveilance of any and all suspected terrorists, use of interrogation that might include abusing underwear, black ops into Iran, Seria, and all other sympathetic countries. <br />Win the war, put it in the hands of warriors and this thing is over in a year. Left to the liberal press, liberals, and haters of the US and this is what we got. Defeatism. Smells like weakness? War sucks, but when used, it should be left to its own devices. I believe that the US military could take this to conclusion without breaking a sweat. But I will have to say, someone might get a bruise.<br /><br />Please someone share with me the history changing, earth shattering policy achievments of Colin Powell? Yea, really miss his strong leadership. Gee how can we live without him. Good man worth being revered, but really a non-factor in policy. 50 years from now he might be an answer to some obscure trivia question.<br /><br />This whole situation is difficult based on what we are doing to ourselves. Get the job done, and stop worrying about how the NY Times is going to portray you. They are going to paint anyone who isn't a hater of the US as a failure, murderer, or facist. Don't worry about it and keep your eye on the ball. We spend way too much time worrying about what others are going to think about us and not enough about how to meet our goals.
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

I agree, we should bomb them back into the stone age.....<br />Then rebuild the country as we see fit.....<br />Lets keep them rigs pumping though! ;) :) :) .....JK
 

Skinnywater

Commander
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
2,065
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Fundamentally I agree with you Pointer. <br />
Win the war, put it in the hands of warriors and this thing is over in a year.
Huuuaaa!!! <br /><br />
Please someone share with me the history changing, earth shattering policy achievments of Colin Powell?
Unfortunately we'll never know. He was used up and tossed into the bucket like a greasy old shop towel. <br /><br /><br />
Even an idot like me can vett these attack attempts and kill them even quicker than we can find the source, and sometimes at the same time.<br />
As soon as I find an image where there is an Ostrich planted up to it's shoulders, I'll post it for you 12feetz. Your links made your arguement that 25% trumps the remainder, that you hold Zinni to a higher standard than the President and that you are changing the arguement instead addressing the basic claims of "incompetent strategically, operationally and tactically."<br />Read the last GAO report/assessment of the facts and know that the trend is for a more deteriorated one with the next report. Try not re-inventing the word "winning".<br />By all means trust in GOD 12footz, but don't confuse him to be Rumsfeld.
 

Boomyal

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
12,072
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Originally posted by POINTER94:<br /> Please someone share with me the history changing, earth shattering policy achievments of Colin Powell?
Oh, Pointer, did you forget? Moderates, like Colin Powell, do not make earth shattering achievments. That is the whole point of 'MODERATES'. They make no waves, they make no one mad, they accomplish nothing. 'MODERATES' do not make history changing, earth shattering policy achievments <br /><br />The deity of political moderation was invented by Liberals, when they could not sell their game.
 

Boomyal

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
12,072
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Whoa! a double post! How did that happen?
 

Skinnywater

Commander
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
2,065
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Moderates, like Colin Powell, do not make earth shattering achievments. That is the whole point of 'MODERATES'. They make no waves, they make no one mad, they accomplish nothing. 'MODERATES' do not make history changing, earth shattering policy achievments
So was that the 'MODERATE' that was addressing the UN to make the case for war to the whole world? So what point were you trying to make again? Sacrificial 'MODERATES'? :confused: <br /><br />I see you and 12 are missing your "Rush" fix.<br />Leave it up to Republicans to have a bone against moderates. By the time this is all over Rush will have some cute hypothesis against conservatives.
 

dogsdad

Lieutenant
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
1,293
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Six retired flag rank officers disagree with SecDef. Big deal. IRRELEVANT. They are subordinates. That means they don't pick the Secretary of Defense or decide if he's doing a good job. What about all the other retired flag rank officers who have made no comment? <br /><br />Gee...on second thought, maybe we should restructure the entire military. Privates get to pick the corporals, corporals and privates get to pick the sergeants, on up the line. That way the top generals and admirals will be real popular dudes, maaaan. Cool.<br /><br />This is all a bunch of (more) politically motivated ctrap on the part of the democrats. What a bunch of pathetic losers.
 

Skinnywater

Commander
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
2,065
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Gee...on second thought, maybe we should restructure the entire military.
Why? Historically they've been the most honest and reliable sector of our government.<br /><br />But then again dogsdad the last time the GAO reports on Iraq were brought up. You dismissed them as just another bias report/assesment.<br />So it's easy to understand why qualified opinions are IRRELLEVANT to you.
 

demsvmejm

Master Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jul 4, 2004
Messages
831
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Techno12 I can see by your links that you would rather hide in your little world supported by radical far right news sources than see the real picture nad debate the facts.<br /><br />I have seen these quotes from the Clinton admin as "proof" that we needed to go to war and as support of claims that Clinton was a gutless president. But what you mindless follow-w-into-oblivion sheople refuse to do is address the facts that the bush admin had updated intel that cast doubt on So-Damn Insane's WMD's. You further refuse to acknowledge that baby bush ignored this intel because it might thwart his master plan to establish his legacy as a war-time president. It would disallow him from trying to bankrupt this country in an attempt to gut any and all domestic programs. All you right-wing nut-jobs can do when the going gets tough is beat a dead horse(the Clinton admin.) That era is over. What was then has been updated with the help of new intelligence from the spy org's. Unfortunately, baby bush has been either too arrogant or ignorant to utilize this new information for the benefit and protection of the average American citizen. So get over your hatred for Clinton and get with on with your lives.
 

Boomyal

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
12,072
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Originally posted by Skinnywater:<br /> So was that the 'MODERATE' that was addressing the UN to make the case for war to the whole world?
According to conventional wisdom (liberal that is) it was only in a weak moment that Powell backed the Admin. He undoubtedly only did it under political pressure, Right?!!! :rolleyes:
 

treedancer

Commander
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,216
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

<br />Did Clinton "Gut" the Military? <br /><br /> http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/pdf/hist.pdf <br /><br /> http://getluky.net/projects/policyresearch/ <br /><br /> Here is two websites that will prove that Clinton did not gut the military, one is a government website, the other is a site that this guy ran a excel program on. <br /> Don’t guess it was gutted to bad in was plenty there to invade two country’s, one justified in my opinion the other was on a bunch of lies
 

Skinnywater

Commander
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
2,065
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

According to conventional wisdom (liberal that is) it was only in a weak moment that Powell backed the Admin. He undoubtedly only did it under political pressure, Right?!!!
In this day and age any black man who calls himself a Republican is a far stretch from being a moderate. <br />Unfortunately, with regards to Powell any potential political statesmanship and other possible attributes were prematurely sacrificed. I think conservatism is being sacrificed much the same way by the Republicans.<br /><br /><br />
All you right-wing nut-jobs ....
Careful David L. Moore that sheet that is drippin' out your nose is getting all over your keyboard..... You are an embarrassment to your own political ideology and your arguements generally add up to a net minus score in a debate....IMO of course. :D <br /><br />Good nite all, truely enjoyed it. Heavy week correcting manufactures beta tests. Although sunshine is predicted for the first time in two months. :cool:
 

dogsdad

Lieutenant
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
1,293
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Someday I'll be as smart as skinnywater and I'll be able to post replies to everyone telling them they're idiots.<br /><br />Quote:<br />"In this day and age any black man who calls himself a Republican is a far stretch from being a moderate." <br /><br />A good example of racism.
 

rodbolt

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
20,066
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

yep clinton gutted it ,I guess. however he was president while I was active duty. during his tenure the USN brought many aegis class crusiers,destroyers and even a nimitz class CVN or two.<br /> our pay went up, the money for training went up the entrance standards doubled, our barracks were vastly improved, our duty rotations were evened out I guess you can call it gutted.<br /> however its 6 years past.<br /> Rumsfeld fired or silenced anyone who opposed his plan for this latest unpleasentness. the original plan was for 350K troops minimum with 450K optimum. Rumsfeld tried it with less than 130K and was advised about the upcoming insurgency.<br /> Rumsfeld saw it as a liberation with rose petals and marching bands the generals treated it as a war.<br /> but who are we fighting?<br /> and why are we fighting in the area we are?<br /> who can surrender?<br /> this war is vastly different than any other as there is no "enemy".<br /> its like catching a fart and pinning it on the wall.<br /> its as stupid as a war on drugs or poverty.<br /> you cannot wage war on a subject, only objects .<br /> Rumsfeld was warned that without enough troops on the ground to secure the Iraq borders AND to fight in the interior no amount of Shock & Awe was ever gonna work.<br /> so far its never worked.<br />even in Japan the big one almost did not work.<br /> japan surrendered not because we shocked and awed them, they were more than ready to continue the fight even though the outcome was inevitable.<br /> in fact the 2nd army leaders had actually kidnaped Hirihito to prevent the surrender.<br /> Hirohito knew that to continue the fight would mean total annhilation of japan. we also knew that if the fight continued we would lose 1-1.5 million troops.<br />but the outcome would have ben the same.<br />all because Japan had a govt that could make decisions for the civilians, Iraq has no such govt.<br /> thats why I have been against Rumfeld and Bush's private war from the outset. I was active duty when we decimated saddams ability/capeability to wage any war outside his border. internal wars were not a US concern.<br /> Isreal bombed saddams nuke research reactor into non-existance in the late 80's and it could not be restarted.<br /> we are in a place doing the wrong thing in the wrong country on a personal vendetta.<br /> its laughable about fighting them here as opposed to there, what are they gonna do? Row over and chunk rocks ?<br />we will be attacked again by some group somewhere and so far not much has been done to secure anything.<br /> its mostly been a dog and pony show.<br /> I just hope we can survive 2 more years of this madness and maybe the next leader can actually do something other than add words to websters and postulate.
 

PW2

Commander
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
2,719
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

----------------------------<br />PW2 - are you suggesting to keep Rummy because he now has experience, been thru the learning curve as it were?!?<br />----------------------------<br /><br />Well, more in the vein of {"What more could he possibly screw up?)<br /><br />The damage is already done in Iraq. Besides, who would replace him? No doubt yet another Neo-con, like Paul Wolfowitz, and all we need is yet another idiot trying to "make his mark"
 

txswinner

Banned
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
2,326
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

One thing that is solid, their are about 25% of the population ready to see the end of the United States as the greatest non-agressive nation in the world just to support one George W. I know the whole election cr...p so do not bother, but at some point you should see the light. I know but Clinton had Monica, well W's administration is scr.....in the whole country and maybe the world.
 

kenimpzoom

Rear Admiral
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
4,807
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

So far the complaints I have seen said Rumsfield thought there were enough troops and the generals said there wasnt.<br /><br />So tell me, where were those troops going to come from? A draft????<br /><br />Rumsfield was reality, the generals were asking for the moon. I dont blame them, I would have asked for more troops too.<br /><br />I seriusly doubt the man is a nice guy, but I havent heard of anything that leads me to think he is incompetent or immoral.<br /><br />Sounds like sour grapes to me.<br /><br />Ken
 

Rattle-

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
172
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

txswinner,<br />Not sure I was reading you right, but are you saying the US is non-agressive, or the Greatest non-agressive country in the world? I had to run to the living-room to get my specs to re-read that.
 

txswinner

Banned
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
2,326
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Formally non-agressive, I would guess is my meaning. Don't worry about me I am a former liberal on drugs turned right wing conservative.
 

rodbolt

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
20,066
Re: Rummy vs the Generals

Ken<br /> you really need to read more about Donald and his past scandals, especially in the late 50's and mid sixties with scooter and Rove.<br /> ole Donny been round the block more than once.<br /> however this war was his personal planning and mostly fantasy.<br /> his mistakes were many and came often, Reagan,carter and pappa Bush would have fired him at the onset instead of giving him a medal.<br /> I do admire the loyalty Jr gives his people, but govt is like biddness and has no place for buddies,especially buddies that make a mistake.<br /> one of the first lessons in life is one awshoot knocks down a whole stack of atta boys.<br /> same as whith FEMA director Brown. he shoulda got canned instantly instead of given a presidential pat on the back and an ease towards the door.<br />Chertoff should have been out the same door.<br /><br /> but Rumsfeld is fighting in fantasy land and its looking more and more like the military has lost confidence in him regardless of presidetial friendships.<br />he can spin it as they will but the guy is a brilliant tactical and strategic planner, I guess.
 
Top