Twin engines vs one single engine

Vic.S

Rear Admiral
Joined
May 4, 2004
Messages
4,719
I have seen a suggestion that two engines will have "more grunt" than one single of twice the power.

eg two 30hp rather than a single 75hp or 80hp.

Sorry no definition of "grunt"

Any comments?
 

Euro95

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
36
Re: Twin engines vs one single engine

When you say twin engines, i am thinking of reliability, and then performance. Not the other way around.

Although i believe two engines together can't match a single with twice as much horsepower.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Twin engines vs one single engine

Not. With twins you double the drag and increase the weight on the transom. Result: less "grunt", whatever grunt means.

Twins offer security and improved slow maneuvering. You can also troll on one, saving some on fuel.
 

jay_merrill

Vice Admiral
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
5,653
Re: Twin engines vs one single engine

If you are speaking of low speed "holeshot," ability to pull skiers up, etc. I doubt you would be able to feel much difference between a dual engine installation and a single engine installation of equal, total horsepower. You might get a bit more "umph" out of the twin rig just because the setup might be somewhat under-propped to insure planing ability on one engine, should the other one fail. That said, you could obviously go with a lower pitch prop on the single, if your operating parameters make a "lighter" pitch more applicable to your needs.

One thing that I would say about a twin installation for water skiing on a smaller boat, is that the skier might be less likely to "wag" the stern of the boat. Having a pair of thrust lines off of center, will have a bit of a stabilizing effect on the boat laterally. As to how much of a factor that might be, I would say that it would be hard to predict. The advantage would also be negligible on a larger boat.

As to drag, I agree that a twin installation of equal horsepower creates more drag, and reduces maximum speed. In my experience, however, they don't affect low speed situations in the same way, simply because the amount of parasite drag relative to the speed of the boat is low. The issue becomes more pronounced at higher speeds because drag doesn't increase in a linear fashion. Instead, what happens is that the rate of increase in drag speeds up as the boat goes faster, resulting in a proportionally higher amount of drag relative to boat speed.

Beyond those issues. the real disadvantage of twin installations is cost. Everything about powering the boat becomes more expensive, from acquisition to mainteneance to fuel burn. I really like twin installations a lot, but converted my present boat from a pair of 35hp ERudes to a single 65hp Johnson. Its hard for me to tell how much of a speed difference is due to the change in motor arrangement, because the ERudes were horsepower rated at the powerhead and the Johnson is rated at the prop, but my boat does go faster now. It also burns a lot less fuel, and I only have one motor to maintain.
 

haskindm

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
255
Re: Twin engines vs one single engine

Only 2 reasons for twin outboards:
1. Redundancy. If one motor quits you MAY be able to limp home on remaining engine. If failure was due to bad fuel, and both engines feed from the same fuel supply, you now have 2 dead engines to repair instead of one.
2. Horsepower needed is not available in a single engine. Example 3 - 250 HP engines on a boat. No 750 horsepower outboards are available.
 

kenmyfam

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
14,392
Re: Twin engines vs one single engine

My preference would be a bigger single with a decent "get you home" kicker.
Kicker would also make a great trolling motor.
But that is just my thoughts.
 
Top