h_lankford
Petty Officer 2nd Class
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2005
- Messages
- 135
Re: Update to 1985 150 Johnson rebuild.
I am not an expert, but have been following your exploits with interest.
Here is some logic I hope is correct and useful.
The BRP catalog says high speed metering orifice (actually not a jet) for your motor is 55C (standard). So if they took out 56C (why was that in there?) and put in new 55C, then you should be running leaner with the 55C than with 56C as is appropriate for higher altitude where you need less gas for less air. Maybe someone can tell us what orifice to use at 6,000 feet, but bogging sounds lean, so larger orifices might be needed for your rebuilt ( ie different) engine.
From my reading on this forum, a 2-step change in orifice is significant, so if your is only 1-step different then that is minor and therefore not the source of your major bogging.
I am not an expert, but have been following your exploits with interest.
Here is some logic I hope is correct and useful.
The BRP catalog says high speed metering orifice (actually not a jet) for your motor is 55C (standard). So if they took out 56C (why was that in there?) and put in new 55C, then you should be running leaner with the 55C than with 56C as is appropriate for higher altitude where you need less gas for less air. Maybe someone can tell us what orifice to use at 6,000 feet, but bogging sounds lean, so larger orifices might be needed for your rebuilt ( ie different) engine.
From my reading on this forum, a 2-step change in orifice is significant, so if your is only 1-step different then that is minor and therefore not the source of your major bogging.