CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

[RubberFrog]

Re: CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

Liberace Brokeback

 

[Dave Abrahamson]

Re: CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

Have a yabba dabba doo time....a dabba doo time....we'll have a GAY ole time!<br />I think the Flinstones intro says it best.<br />When did it start meaning something else?

 

[oddjob]

Re: CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

LOL @Dave

 

[demsvmejm]

Re: CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

Let's see, in order to emphasize their accomplishment we must acknowledge that a person is gay. Is it such a rarity that a gay person could be influential or outstanding that when one is we have to emphasize that fact?<br /><br />Seems like that's exactly what this ditzball is saying...<br />"Homosexuals generally can not accomplish anything of significance. Therefore, if someone who is homosexual does defy the norm and does something exceptional we have to spotlight the fact they were homosexual."<br /><br />Seems like that's what Sen. Sheila Kuehl is implying. It should make you embarrassed to be a Democrat. Glad I am an independent thinking voter.

 

[RubberFrog]

Re: CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

Like other things that get passed, this bill stinks.

 

[markvan]

Re: CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

Either stand on your own merits or get back in the closet, your choice. When you accomplish something, get a promotion, win at something would you rather get it knowing you actually earned it on your own merit and not any other reason. give em 10% off vasiline and tell them to get back in the closet, things were so much better then.

 

[markvan]

Re: CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

maybe that last post was a bit harse as after all "its somelthing they are born with" lmao

 

[18rabbit]

Re: CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

Originally posted by heycods:<br />

Originally posted by RubberFrog:<br /> I did hear that Ben Franklin was quite the ladies man.

Your source sir. I cant believe it of ya frog, trying to defame a good mam like that.

Try “The First American – The Life and Times of Benj Franklin” by H.W. Brands.<br />ISBN 0-385-49540-4<br /><br />It’s an excellent read!<br /><br />Not only was old Ben a lady’s man, he was the consummate horn dog that didn’t let little details, like the fact that a woman was married stop him from his endeavors. Franklin took steps to hide the progeny of his sexual forays from his legacy, tho some evidence of it exists. We don’t know how many illegitimate children he had, but we do know of the one he raised with (adopted?) by his wife, but we don’t know why and we don’t know who the child’s real mother was. Even as an older man he couldn't resist a young woman.<br /><br />Go, Ben, Go!!!<br />

 

[RubberFrog]

Re: CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

Thanks for the correction from ladies to lady's. You are correct. It is possessive and not plural.

 

[18rabbit]

Re: CALIFORNIA'S 'GAY HISTORY' BILL ADVANCES

Nooooooo!!! I NEVER correct anyone’e English. Nope, not me. Me Engrish no gooder.<br /><br />What you witnessed was the genius of MS Word’s spelling and parsing checkers. When they fail, I fail.<br />