WillyBWright
Fleet Admiral
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
- Messages
- 8,200
President Bush is unabashedly blocking all attempts to get Harriet Miers and Alberto Gonzalez to testify under oath (among others). He will only consent to closed hearings and no oath. Why? What does he have to hide? What other possible motive could there be? I can see testifying in private rather than in public due to the ever-convenient national security excuse (regarding Judicial appointments?). But no oath? For a sitting Attorney General and a former Supreme Court nominee, no oath? That's like telegraphing the world they they intend to lie and don't want to be punished for it. Simple as that. Frankly I wouldn't expect a word of truth from Carl von Rovenstein one way or the other, oath or not.