QC said:
My "enjoying yourselves" comment had nothing to do with Iraq, only the list of posters to your thread. With that said, as we all like to divert by asking questions, I have tried this a couple of times with no answer. If you had an Iraq wish, would you put Saddam Hussein back in power? He kept the sectarian violence down. It seems that is your biggest concern. Or is it US lives? Or is it US Imperialist ambitions? What in a nut shell is your biotch with Iraq? How we wage it, or if we wage it? If it is
if, then you should get over it, because as I often like to say "there ain't no stinkin' rewind button".
If it is
how we wage it, well OK, it would be nice if they were not trying to kill eachother and our troops too. The fact is we are there and we are a police force until it is safe enough to give control 100% to the Iraqis. Maybe you think we should just leave and let them kill each other and let them merge with Iran? I am not sure how letting them kill each other is a whole lot different than dropping a nuke on them, we know it will be complete murder, mahem etc., which all of us with a morsel of sanity agree is bad . . .
Of course, I would not have gone in in the first place, so I'd have to say that I did not consider Saddam a particular threat.
Would I dust him off, say we're sorry, and return him to power? Of course not.
And no, I don't have a simple answer to this. Malaki and his bunch are already aligning themselves with Iran, and he even forced us to let one of captured Sadr Militia death squad leaders loose.
We *have* to find a political solution to this, get our soldiers off the role as target, and get the regional players involved politically somehow. That includes Iran, Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi, Turkey, snd others.
It won't be easy to do. The pending result is an all out regional power struggle and war, or Sadr taking over Iraq, which may be worse.
We are not in a position to fix this on our own, and if we have to withdraw to get others involved, that is what we need to do.