Re: Would my 90hp 2 stroke push 22 footer?
Maybe they had TWO Fat Fifties on them???
to the OP-the 17ft boat with the 90hp sounds alot better.
We had, my dad and also my grandfather, had boats in the 22 foot size range, back in the early 60s to 70s. My dad's boat was a 22 foot Lyman Lapstrake bought circa 1958. It ran twin 40s and would scoot along about 30 MPH top speed, give or take, loaded with our family of six. We would run out well over the horizon just as everybody else did in those days, fishing and diving. My grandfather had a similar "cabin cruiser" with small twins on it, I think they were Merc 50s, it was also about 22/24 feet long and would run along about 26 MPH if that. Both boats were wooden construction, had sharp entry bows and rather shallow barrel shaped sterns and aft sections. Engines were not reliable and more than once we came back on one and they sucked fuel like crazy. Neither boat weighed nearly as much as my current Boston Whaler Nantucket/Outrage 190 modified deep vee, probably a little over half the 2,200 pound bare hull weight of the Whaler we have now. Neither were as fast, neither required as much power to plane, neither were nearly as capable or seaworthy and I would rather have one modern engine, in this case a 150 Optimax than two old time point ignition, carburated geezers. Those were beautiful boats but required amazing amounts of upkeep and looking back, frankly, we should have been a little more scared of big water in them than we were as neither would have done anything other than deep six if swamped and neither were self bailing. Compared to our current Whaler, it will self bail, float with the plug out just fine and is completely stable even with six inches or a foot of water in the sole from a stuffed bow, just shove the throttle in and the water dumps out, no gray hair.
Yeah, if you close the stern, mount a bracket and put two of the 80/90 horse engines on it, you would be OK, one, uh, it would be a huge slug. Deep vee boats take a lot of power to get on top.