More good news, NOT, talked Eddie and he says I need the length to keep reversion down. So I called and stopped the guy from working on the exhaust. I'm going in Monday to see if he can make me a tube to fit what I have (doubt it) or I'll be cutting the holes so it will come straight out. If I do that I'll probably have to go up 2 inches, and with that might need to add length to my turndowns. Sure looking like it might be getting cold before the boat gets wet
:cold: :mad-new: :grumpy:
Hey AD - I have not read all of the posts in this thread thoroughly, so my apologies if certain things have been covered, but I want to see if I have a good understanding of the situation. . . .
- The holes in the transom do not line up perfectly with the new exhaust elbows
- The new exhaust elbows run closer to the transom than the previous elbows, giving less freedom for a flex hose.
- The old elbows had enough distance between the elbow tip and the transom, so that the standard exhaust hose could accommodate the slight mis-alignment of the holes in the transom.
- The new elbows have a greater distance where the water and the exhaust travel separately and mix further away from the exhaust manifold. This is needed because the increased HP of the engine came, in part, due to a higher overlapped cam setup and the possibility of reversion exists with this setup.
Is all of this correct for the most part? If so, I would think your best approach may be to make new holes in the transom that line up perfectly with the new elbows. This would be a bit tricky, since the new holes would cover about 80% of the area of the previous holes, but you could probably make a 'patch segment' of the previous holes. . . . or patch the existing holes entirely and drill new ones in the exact location that is needed.
Just my thoughts, but I wanted to share.