Ya got medical coverage? Tell that jerk from the ins. co. that you're back is bothering you since the accident & will get worse the more he jerks you around. Tell him you may have to take a trip to the e.r. Plus you had pasengers on board that are sore as hell. I have a feeling that he'll pay up quickly.
Oh, but it's ok for an ins. co. to deny a legitimate claim? And for your information pal, how do u know that nobody may have to seek medical attention in the future? I'm not advocating that anyone commit ins. fraud. My point is that when you're dealing with an ins.co. that denies a legitimate claim, sometimes u have to play hard ball, & if that means putting the screws to them a little bit, then so be it. Tough. As far as your advice to seek a lawyer, maybe u should know what your talking about before giving advice. The lawyer will cost him more than the claim is worth. If I were him, I would appeal the denial of his claim, & include signed written avidavits from all on board as to what happened to back up his appeal. If the claim is still denied he can take his case to binding arbitration, which will cost him a fraction of what an attoney would charge. So, get off your high horse, & spare me the sermons. Until you yourself know what you are talking about.Sea Wolf, what you are advocating is Insurance Fraud. You might want to reconsider that.
Secondly, in a First Party Claim (which is where you file a claim on your own insurance) you have limits of insurance, and you don't get compensated one penny more than your legitimate costs. So there is no big (fraudulent) settlement on injuries. Maybe you should actually know what you are talking about before you type your responses?
300, they still need to provide an alternate reason for the damage. Or at least conclusive proof that it wasn't a collision. In their written denial, that you will be receiving shortly, they will have this info. If it's not there, it's definately time to consult an attorney, or maybe first, your agent (if you have one) to see if they can exert any influence.
Good luck.
No... They will only say verbally that they believe an underwater impact did not cause the damage.
No, it is you smart guy, that doesn't know what he is talking about. Try doing a Google search on "Binding Arbitration" & learn something before you go spouting off. Yes, Flyer will be hurt, if he listens to clueless posters like you. In the real world, which u obviously don't live in, sometimes u have to beat them at their own game & think like they do, i.e., insurance co's who are only interested in the bottom line instead of being fair with policy holders like Flyer. And I'm not suggesting to anyone that they commit insurance fraud.Sea Wolf, you can do lots of things to play "hardball", but lying about injuries is not one of them. That's fraud. Simple. And again, in a first party claim, injuries don't make you any money.
Arbitration is for claims between two insurance carriers, not a policy holder and their carrier. Any other mistakes you want to make?
You don't know what you are talking about, so stop talking, please.
Flyer, look at your policy. They have to give you in writing the reason for denying your claim. Verbally just won't suffice. And take pictures of the damage, or have the shop do it. Is the shop that u brought it to use to dealing with ins. co's? If not, find one that is.bruceb58 asked: Will the boat dealer be willing to put into writing what he feels caused the damage?
If the shop that inspected the damage and gave a repair estimate told the insurance adjuster that "an underwater impact did not cause the damage" as stated above, then the insurer has a good reason to deny the claim. So Flyer, did you misspeak, or is everyone lining up against you?
No... They will only say verbally that they believe an underwater impact did not cause the damage.
Yes, small claims is an option, and is good up to $25000.00. Costs a couple hundred to do that.
I am going to investigate what my options are with respect to government insurance industry standards next week.
Flyer, will do. Good luck.Guys,
This whole situation has been very stressful already... Do we really need to argue about insurance here as well?I appreciate all the helpful comments but , please... Let?s keep it civil.
Here is a bit of an update:
This morning I took the boat to a 3rd repair facility to have them look at it. I was very up front with them, and told them the complete story, including the fact the two previous shops who looked at agreed that the damage was NOT caused by an underwater impact.
I am now feeling somewhat vindicated. The owner of the marina himself had a good look at all the damage, and stated that while he too would have expected more damage on the drive itself from that type of impact, there simply was no other logical explanation, AND agreed to speak to my insurance company on Monday, on my behalf.
I am feeling a bit better about this.
I will update again once that happens on Monday.
two previous shops who looked at agreed that the damage was NOT caused by an underwater impact.
Something don't make sense here. You state that two different shops said that it was not from an under water impact? If two different shops say their expert opinion is that the damage was not caused by an under water impact, then there is much more to this story then is being told.
The shops have no reason to side with the insurance company. All they want is paid for the repairs. If it was from an under water impact, there is no reason why they wouldn't tell that to the insurance company.
How about you post pictures of all the damage. I have heard of many accidents with boats, underwater, and collisions of all kinds, and nobody was ever denied.
There legally has to be supporting evidence for an insurance company to deny a claim. And it is obvious, not only does the adjust have supporting evidence, he has two shops to support expert testimony.
There is definitely more to this story then what is being presented.