Mile high city gets Higher

brother chris

Commander
Joined
Jul 28, 2002
Messages
2,063
Re: Mile high city gets Higher

Originally posted by ZmOz:<br />
Originally posted by brother chris:<br />Other than that, it makes you stupid(or at least, forgetful) over the long run.
While under the influence, yes. "Over the long run" (if you're refering to permanent forgetfullness even when not high) ABSOLUTELY NOT.<br /><br />
Well, I 100% disagree with you. <br />I know quite a few people who are stupider because they have smoked ALOT of pot in their lives. <br />Now, I am not saying "everyone" is like that, but it does happen.<br />So, maybe from YOUR experience, that's the case, but not from my experience.
 

ZmOz

Captain
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
3,949
Re: Mile high city gets Higher

Originally posted by brother chris:<br />Well, I 100% disagree with you.
You might as well disagree that the sky is blue. Or the ocean is wet. Or Rosie Odonnel is fat. The people you know are stupid because of genetics, just like the billion or so other people on this planet that are hopelessly stupid. <br /><br />
FACT: None of the medical tests currently used to detect brain damage in humans have found harm from marijuana, even from long term high-dose use. An early study reported brain damage in rhesus monkeys after six months exposure to high concentrations of marijuana smoke. In a recent, more carefully conducted study, researchers found no evidence of brain abnormality in monkeys that were forced to inhale the equivalent of four to five marijuana cigarettes every day for a year. The claim that marijuana kills brain cells is based on a speculative report dating back a quarter of a century that has never been supported by any scientific study.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD PEOPLE, LEARN THE FACTS!
 

Kalian

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
598
Re: Mile high city gets Higher

Zmoz.<br />Let me throw you a bone. http://www.drugabuse.gov/drugpages/marijuana.html <br /> (you'll have to dig through the site to find the info) Now repeat the process of telling me my facts are wrong and yours are right. Your facts come from a website that is for a stoners point of view, my facts come from a govt. publication, with footnotes providing info on sources. The info on your site is basicaly rehashed on sites all over the internet. Most all have the same verbage and are obviously sites that were mostly all cut and pasted. A few of these clone sites list resources, and they go back to NIDA. But the info on NIDA states that there ARE medical problems, marijuana IS addictive, IS a gateway drug, DOES impair driving ability, etc. etc. etc. Basicaly, the sites you and alumistar list are taking things from the govt. site and twisting it and quoting out of context.<br /> You and alumistar say I came here and posted without facts but your wrong. I had facts. You are misled, and don't want to accept it. <br /> And alumistar, it doesn't give you much credibility to rant and rave like that. Sorry I hurt your feelings by not accepting your propaganda. I sure would hate to actualy HAVE a debate with such an expert debater as yourself. So far you've said I've made statements not based on fact when I provided you with a link that shows you where I get my facts from in the very begining of this "debate". You say I'm basing my remarks on personal experience. Well, my personal experience has been that smoking weed makes some people stupid, and definitly impairs your ability to drive. Thats hard to argue with. Some might say thats common sense. Thats the personal experience of other people as well, not just me. That and the facts that I get from the site I provided earlier that back that up. Thats good enough for me. You say I come in and bring up something thats unrelated to the "debate" (my alcohol eperiences.) but it was brought up simply to prove a point, albeit sarcastic. You provide insults and attack my character, and then mention my past troubles with alcohol, as if that has anything to do with the so called "debate". (For the record, I am ashamed of some of the things I've done in the past and take full responsibility for it, and driving drunk is one of them. We all make mistakes, I've made mine and you've made yours. What I did was wrong, I'm just grateful that I never hurt anyone.) Lastly, you basicly tell me to stay out of the debate if I don't agree with you.("if you don't like the debate and are deadset against it, stay out of the debate.")<br /> Yep, I'd sure hate to debate such an "expert" debater as yourself! ;) <br />But it's all good, buddy.<br /> By the way, I didn't know what you meant about the "not reading your post" remark until I went back and reread the begining. Now I understand. When I said I didn't read what you posted, I was refering to the link I thought you provided refering to the law passed in Colorado. When I went back and read it I realized it was OMC who provided the link, not you. I did read your post in the begining lol, sorry for the misunderstanding. You can beat me to death on that if you want, I admit I was misleading, although not intentional.
 

ZmOz

Captain
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
3,949
Re: Mile high city gets Higher

Originally posted by Kalian:<br />Your facts come from a website that is for a stoners point of view, my facts come from a govt. publication
How friggin' brainwashed are you? GOVERNMENT RESOURCES ARE NOT A RELIABLE OR UNBIASED SOURCE FOR THIS SORT OF INFORMATION! (or any sort of information for that matter) If the address includes .gov it might as well be in chinese, because it's completely worthless! The websites I gave you are not "from a stoners point of view". They are unbiased websites that list INFORMATION.<br /><br />Seriously, is there anyone here who thinks the government provides unbiased information on marijuana?<br /><br /><br />
Originally posted by Kalian:<br />Lastly, you basicly tell me to stay out of the debate if I don't agree with you.
No, as I said before if you want to vote against legalizing pot that's great. It doesn't matter anway, you'll probably lose if it ever comes up to vote. BUT you need to have a good reason why and some facts to back it up - you don't.
 

alumistar

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Nov 23, 2003
Messages
154
Re: Mile high city gets Higher

kalian, i did say, "if you don't like the debate and are deadset against it, stay out of the DISCUSSION." not debate. this thread was never started as a debate. it was started as a topic discussion to see if one more cast could get an answer to whether or not crime would go down, and whether it's considered legal or not. i simply stated what i know from news casts here, not websites as you say i have. in fact, almost all the information i aquire is from local media, and hardcopy. rarely do i ever get my intel from the internet. it is way tooeasy to get incorrect information, or information that has been rewritten to follow someone's personal agenda. never once did i list that i got info from a website, especially from a .gov site. if i'm going to get information as accurately as i can from the internet, it will be from a .org site. i also never said that it doesn't impair your ability to operate on any level. in that matter, you are right, it does impair your ability to do some things. i disagree about it being addictive, period. i have and know people that have quit for years on end with no problems whatsoever. i agree zmoz that people are pre-destined to be stupid and do stupid things. pot, just like alcohol, magnafies this. as far as my saying that you base your argument without fact, my answer is yes. you've only based your argument on .gov info. which i might add is LEADING the pot war. i don't give a rat's a$$ about other drugs, as far as i'm concerned theycan go on a burning spree world-wide. remember my first post about the '20's? it is completely true, although i forget the guy's name who illegalized it in the first place. did you know the main reason they won't legalize it is because there is no known way to detect the amount of marijuana in one's system at the point of being pulled over? there is no roadside blood test, breathalizer or the like? if that were invented, the law would definately change on the spot! yes, i did attack your character and provide subtle insults. your very first post had nothing to do with the original subject in the first place. <br /> you said,"I don't know about anyone else here, but I strongly disagree. The last thing this country needs is a bunch of potheads. Legalizing it is just one more step down the hill we're already screaming down at breakneck speed." what in the blue he11 do you think is going on? potheads are already potheads. legalizing is not a step downhill, it's a step sideways. it is a lateral move. and breakneck speed? i think our wonderful government, who is so concerned about our safety that they will provide false info to give a "security binky" to all the little babies in this country is who is moving us downhill at breakneck speeds. i truely believe that there would be a reduction in crime, and an increase in revenue if they would do this one thing that i believe would make both sides happy: decriminalize it. her's the breakdown on what i think they should do, and how to go about it: 1)decriminalize it, not legalize it. do this on the state and federal levels. 2) set a flat amount across the nation that any person can carry, call it one ounce. 3) fines should be set at no higher than 100 dollars, including court costs, which puts the fine itself at about 35-50 dollars. if someone has over that amount confiscate the whole lot, including all cash on hand regaurdless if it's verifiably from somewhere else or not. it's not going to work if they throw the book at someone who has any amount over the previously stated "decriminalized" amount.4) set it in traffic court, falling off your record in three years. 5)sit back and collect 100 bucks per shot from each moron every day that is dumb enough to get caught in the first place. my final proposition is to make it a petty offense to grow, buy, or sell. same statute as above except the fine is moved up to 500 dollars and confiscation of all related items, including a personal estate search for any associated items, again, falling off your record after three years. there ya' go. not legal, not illegal, just another law to add into the countless moronic laws in the books already. kalian, i am sorry to say that i am really tired of people like you. you have good points, but you don't debate, you simply preach. it reminds me of the republican and democratic parties. "a vote for nader is a vote for bush", bull! although nader is an idiot. "a vote for kerry is a vote for the taliban", bull! "a vote for bush is a vote for armageddon", bull! "we can't pull out now without catastrophic consequences", bull! "pot is like coke, if you do it you will go out raping and killing people", good god, BULL!!! that last quote is directly from the documentary played on the history channel dealing directly with the history of the laws banning pot. honestly, kalian, i am done debating with you. you're only defamation attempt is to try to reword what i say and then throw it back at me. other people who read this post will make their own conclusions about it. all you have done is solidify my statements by making me repeat myself, which is something that i don't care to do often. others will see through all the crap written, do their own searches and find their own guiding light. i just hope they are not so close minded as to do what you have done and shut the majority out and call us losers or whatever you all call us.<br />on a side note, you have stated more than once that i am a pothead, and should stay off the toking. be that as it may, i smoke about 1/8th of an ounce per month, on the weekends, prefferably saturday mornings with a few cups of coffee. that hardly constitutes being a pothead. i am sorry that i attacked your alcoholism. i am glad, and relieved to hear that you don't dui anymore. as you stated, i have made my mistakes. too many to go into, but none have ever involved dui's(caught or not caught). whoever it was that said,"i hope you don't do that crap whilst boating." no, i do not. i will not put my son in that position. i do not drive on weed. again, i will not put my son in that position. only saturday's, only at home, only with coffee. :D kalian, this has definately been one of the most interesting debates i've engaged in on this topic. most of my discussions and debates involve politics. not many people debate weed that much. just goes to show how many people don't really care one way or the other. fact is, people will do what they want, legal or not. have a great day, and please respond to this one last time, and we'll call it done. -k-?
 

JasonJ

Rear Admiral
Joined
Aug 20, 2001
Messages
4,163
Re: Mile high city gets Higher

Geez Alumistar,I thought I wrote long posts :) ...BTW, you don't need a roadside means of determining intoxicant levels. If you fail Field Sobriety Tests when on drugs or pot, you are taken in and a specialist evaluates and draws a blood/urine sample, so that can't be used as a reason pot isn't legal. <br /><br />My only stand on the issue is pot doesn't need to be legal, but there are considerably worse things out there that is legal. Heck, huffing spraypaint is worse than pot...
 

alumistar

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Nov 23, 2003
Messages
154
Re: Mile high city gets Higher

yeah jasonj, once in a while it goes on and on. few and far between though. i just like to get all of what's on my mind out, that way there's no mistaking what's been written. you're right, there are many things far worse than pot. that's what i was saying though; it doesn't need to be completely legalized, just decriminalized, across the board. hey, did you know, in colorado, you have to be 18 with i.d. to buy spraypaint? just another one of those funny things. oh yeah, i'm sorry, i wasn't trying to say you need a roadside test for it to be legal. it's one of the reasons why it can't be "completely" legalized, unlike alcohol with breathalizers
 

ZmOz

Captain
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
3,949
Re: Mile high city gets Higher

Originally posted by JasonJ:<br />Heck, huffing spraypaint is worse than pot...
Another good reason why it should be legal. Would you rather have teenagers experimenting with spray paint/xylene/glue/gas/butane sniffing, or smoking a little pot? Surely if pot is legal they won't be wasting their time on that s**t.<br /><br />I realize that pot should never be legal for anyone under 18 or 21, but if it's legal for those people it will be much more available to underage people...
 
Top