QC
Supreme Mariner
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2005
- Messages
- 22,783
Re: Use the Sherman anti-trust act
PW2,<br /><br />You'd be surprised how much I agree about the infrastructure stuff, and that is one of the reasons that I don't believe in Hydrogen. With that said, there are many examples in the past that disprove both of our opinions (us Hydrogen, you innovations). The first liquid fuels had no infrastructure either yet they got going without Gov't assistance I think. Automobiles themselves are contradictory to your comment about slight variations, unless you consider an automobile as a slight variation of a train which was a slight variation of a horse . . .
<br /><br />On your last point, it is the flaw in my faith. On a professional level I argue for funding alternate fuels infrastructure every day, but I don't really believe in the need for that support privately. I am still grappling with this issue. We (alt fuels industry) often say that Petroleum has had a 100 year head start on us, so we just need the playing field evened. But is that really true? I still think that with enough of an economic driver ($25 a gallon?) big stuff will happen. Yes, our economy will suffer and/or change. This species is pretty darn resilient. I just don't believe we will all self destruct and that our kids will hate us even as destructed as we are. I am more concerned about people blowing me and my family up than I am about a big implosion of my life due to fuel 
PW2,<br /><br />You'd be surprised how much I agree about the infrastructure stuff, and that is one of the reasons that I don't believe in Hydrogen. With that said, there are many examples in the past that disprove both of our opinions (us Hydrogen, you innovations). The first liquid fuels had no infrastructure either yet they got going without Gov't assistance I think. Automobiles themselves are contradictory to your comment about slight variations, unless you consider an automobile as a slight variation of a train which was a slight variation of a horse . . .